Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] of/address: Introduce of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()

Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-10-15T10:03:24Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 728 bytes --]

On Thu, 2020-10-15 at 07:42 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +phys_addr_t __init of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + phys_addr_t max_cpu_addr = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> > + struct of_range_parser parser;
> > + phys_addr_t subtree_max_addr;
> > + struct device_node *child;
> > + phys_addr_t cpu_end = 0;
> > + struct of_range range;
> > + const __be32 *ranges;
> > + int len;
> > +
> > + if (!np)
> > + np = of_root;
>
> Requiring of_root to be passed explicitly would seem more natural
> to me than the magic NULL argument. There doesn't seem to be any
> precedent for that kind of calling convention either.

I inspired that behavior from __of_find_all_nodes(). I'll change it.

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]