From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/sva: Remove mm parameter from SVA bind API
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:26:02 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414112602.GA1370958@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41433d99-e413-f5bf-5279-695dae6c58ba@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:22:09PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> I still worry about supervisor pasid allocation.
>
> If we use iommu_sva_alloc_pasid() to allocate a supervisor pasid, which
> mm should the pasid be set? I've ever thought about passing &init_mm to
> iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(). But if you add "mm != current->mm", this seems
> not to work. Or do you prefer a separated interface for supervisor pasid
> allocation/free?
Without a mm_struct it is not SVA, so don't use SVA APIs for whatever
a 'supervisor pasid' is
Jason
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 17:08 [PATCH 1/2] iommu/sva: Tighten SVA bind API with explicit flags Jacob Pan
2021-04-08 17:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/sva: Remove mm parameter from SVA bind API Jacob Pan
2021-04-09 10:11 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-04-09 18:03 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-14 0:09 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-14 6:22 ` Lu Baolu
2021-04-14 11:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-04-15 5:33 ` Lu Baolu
2021-04-15 11:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-09 12:45 ` Lu Baolu
2021-04-09 18:08 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-09 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/sva: Tighten SVA bind API with explicit flags Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-04-09 21:57 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-09 12:24 ` Lu Baolu
2021-04-13 22:13 ` Jacob Pan
2021-04-13 13:02 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-14 4:11 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210414112602.GA1370958@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox