Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATACH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Use user privilege for RID2PASID translation
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:03:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512170349.GB102348@otc-nc-03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210512064426.3440915-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 02:44:26PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> When first-level page tables are used for IOVA translation, we use user
> privilege by setting U/S bit in the page table entry. This is to make it
> consistent with the second level translation, where the U/S enforcement
> is not available. Clear the SRE (Supervisor Request Enable) field in the
> pasid table entry of RID2PASID so that requests requesting the supervisor
> privilege are blocked and treated as DMA remapping faults.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: b802d070a52a1 ("iommu/vt-d: Use iova over first level")
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 7 +++++--
>  drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 708f430af1c4..f1742da42478 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -2525,9 +2525,9 @@ static int domain_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>  				    struct device *dev,
>  				    u32 pasid)
>  {
> -	int flags = PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE;
>  	struct dma_pte *pgd = domain->pgd;
>  	int agaw, level;
> +	int flags = 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Skip top levels of page tables for iommu which has
> @@ -2543,7 +2543,10 @@ static int domain_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>  	if (level != 4 && level != 5)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	flags |= (level == 5) ? PASID_FLAG_FL5LP : 0;
> +	if (pasid != PASID_RID2PASID)
> +		flags |= PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE;
> +	if (level == 5)
> +		flags |= PASID_FLAG_FL5LP;

Given that we are still not bought into the supervisor PASID, should we make this an 
explicit request before turning on SUPERVISOR mode always? Since
pasid_set_sre() has no return, we have no way to fail it.



>  
>  	if (domain->domain.type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
>  		flags |= PASID_FLAG_PAGE_SNOOP;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> index 72646bafc52f..72dc84821dad 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> @@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_second_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>  	 * Since it is a second level only translation setup, we should
>  	 * set SRE bit as well (addresses are expected to be GPAs).
>  	 */
> -	pasid_set_sre(pte);
> +	if (pasid != PASID_RID2PASID)
> +		pasid_set_sre(pte);
>  	pasid_set_present(pte);
>  	pasid_flush_caches(iommu, pte, pasid, did);
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
Cheers,
Ashok

[Forgiveness is the attribute of the STRONG - Gandhi]
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12  6:44 [RESEND PATACH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Use user privilege for RID2PASID translation Lu Baolu
2021-05-12 17:03 ` Raj, Ashok [this message]
2021-05-13  3:06   ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210512170349.GB102348@otc-nc-03 \
    --to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox