From: Nicolin Chen via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
<alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
<corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: jean-philippe@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass cmdq pointer in arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist()
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:59:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210831025923.15812-11-nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210831025923.15812-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com>
The driver currently calls arm_smmu_get_cmdq() helper internally in
different places, though they are all actually called from the same
source -- arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() function.
This patch changes this to pass the cmdq pointer to these functions
instead of calling arm_smmu_get_cmdq() every time.
This also helps NVIDIA implementation, which maintains its own cmdq
pointers and needs to redirect the cmdq pointer from arm_smmu->cmdq
pointer to its own, upon scanning the illegal commands by checking
the opcode of the cmdlist.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 6878a83582b9..216f3442aac4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -584,11 +584,11 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_valid_map(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
/* Wait for the command queue to become non-full */
static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
int ret = 0;
/*
@@ -619,11 +619,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
* Must be called with the cmdq lock held in some capacity.
*/
static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
{
int ret = 0;
struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
u32 *cmd = (u32 *)(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, llq->prod));
queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
@@ -643,10 +643,10 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
* Must be called with the cmdq lock held in some capacity.
*/
static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
{
struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
u32 prod = llq->prod;
int ret = 0;
@@ -693,12 +693,13 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
}
static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
{
if (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_MSIPOLL)
- return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(smmu, llq);
+ return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(smmu, cmdq, llq);
- return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(smmu, llq);
+ return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(smmu, cmdq, llq);
}
static void arm_smmu_cmdq_write_entries(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq, u64 *cmds,
@@ -755,7 +756,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
- if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, &llq))
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, cmdq, &llq))
dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
local_irq_save(flags);
}
@@ -831,7 +832,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
/* 5. If we are inserting a CMD_SYNC, we must wait for it to complete */
if (sync) {
llq.prod = queue_inc_prod_n(&llq, n);
- ret = arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_sync(smmu, &llq);
+ ret = arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_sync(smmu, cmdq, &llq);
if (ret) {
dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
"CMD_SYNC timeout at 0x%08x [hwprod 0x%08x, hwcons 0x%08x]\n",
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-31 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-31 2:59 [RFC][PATCH v2 00/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add NVIDIA implementation Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 01/13] iommu: Add set_nesting_vmid/get_nesting_vmid functions Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/13] vfio: add VFIO_IOMMU_GET_VMID and VFIO_IOMMU_SET_VMID Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 03/13] vfio: Document VMID control for IOMMU Virtualization Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 04/13] vfio: add set_vmid and get_vmid for vfio_iommu_type1 Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 05/13] vfio/type1: Implement set_vmid and get_vmid Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 06/13] vfio/type1: Set/get VMID to/from iommu driver Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 07/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add shared VMID support for NESTING Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 08/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add VMID alloc/free helpers Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 09/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass dev pointer to arm_smmu_detach_dev Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` Nicolin Chen via iommu [this message]
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 11/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add implementation infrastructure Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 12/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for NVIDIA CMDQ-Virtualization hw Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 2:59 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 13/13] iommu/nvidia-smmu-v3: Add mdev interface support Nicolin Chen via iommu
2021-08-31 16:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 00/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add NVIDIA implementation Alex Williamson
2021-09-01 6:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-09-02 14:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-09-02 22:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-09-16 18:21 ` Nicolin Chen via iommu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210831025923.15812-11-nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox