From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Fix an unbalanced rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock()
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:24:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211122032458.2549761-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211122032458.2549761-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
If we return -EOPNOTSUPP, the rcu lock remains lock. This is spurious.
Go through the end of the function instead. This way, the missing
'rcu_read_unlock()' is called.
Fixes: 7afd7f6aa21a ("iommu/vt-d: Check FL and SL capability sanity in scalable mode")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/40cc077ca5f543614eab2a10e84d29dd190273f6.1636217517.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/cap_audit.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/cap_audit.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/cap_audit.c
index b39d223926a4..71596fc62822 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/cap_audit.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/cap_audit.c
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static int cap_audit_static(struct intel_iommu *iommu, enum cap_audit_type type)
{
struct dmar_drhd_unit *d;
struct intel_iommu *i;
+ int rc = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
if (list_empty(&dmar_drhd_units))
@@ -169,11 +170,11 @@ static int cap_audit_static(struct intel_iommu *iommu, enum cap_audit_type type)
*/
if (intel_cap_smts_sanity() &&
!intel_cap_flts_sanity() && !intel_cap_slts_sanity())
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
- return 0;
+ return rc;
}
int intel_cap_audit(enum cap_audit_type type, struct intel_iommu *iommu)
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-22 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 3:24 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v5.16-rc3 Lu Baolu
2021-11-22 3:24 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2021-11-22 3:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Fix unmap_pages support Lu Baolu
2021-11-26 12:47 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-23 11:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v5.16-rc3 Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211122032458.2549761-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox