From: Jason Gunthorpe via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] driver core: platform: Add driver dma ownership management
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 19:15:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211128231509.GA966332@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YaM5Zv1RrdidycKe@kroah.com>
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 09:10:14AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 10:50:38AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > Multiple platform devices may be placed in the same IOMMU group because
> > they cannot be isolated from each other. These devices must either be
> > entirely under kernel control or userspace control, never a mixture. This
> > checks and sets DMA ownership during driver binding, and release the
> > ownership during driver unbinding.
> >
> > Driver may set a new flag (suppress_auto_claim_dma_owner) to disable auto
> > claiming DMA_OWNER_DMA_API ownership in the binding process. For instance,
> > the userspace framework drivers (vfio etc.) which need to manually claim
> > DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN_USER when assigning a device to userspace.
>
> Why would any vfio driver be a platform driver?
Why not? VFIO implements drivers for most physical device types
these days. Why wouldn't platform be included?
> That should never be the case as they obviously are not platform
> drivers, they are virtual ones.
Huh?
> > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_device.h b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > index 7c96f169d274..779bcf2a851c 100644
> > +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ struct platform_driver {
> > struct device_driver driver;
> > const struct platform_device_id *id_table;
> > bool prevent_deferred_probe;
> > + bool suppress_auto_claim_dma_owner;
>
> What platform driver needs this change?
It is in patch 12:
--- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static struct platform_driver vfio_platform_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "vfio-platform",
},
+ .suppress_auto_claim_dma_owner = true,
};
Which is how VFIO provides support to DPDK for some Ethernet
controllers embedded in a few ARM SOCs.
It is also used in patch 17 in five tegra platform_drivers to make
their sharing of an iommu group between possibly related
platform_driver's safer.
> > USE_PLATFORM_PM_SLEEP_OPS
> > @@ -1478,7 +1505,8 @@ struct bus_type platform_bus_type = {
> > .probe = platform_probe,
> > .remove = platform_remove,
> > .shutdown = platform_shutdown,
> > - .dma_configure = platform_dma_configure,
> > + .dma_configure = _platform_dma_configure,
>
> What happened to the original platform_dma_configure() function?
It is still called. The issue here is that platform_dma_configure has
nothing to do with platform and is being re-used by AMBA.
Probably the resolution to both remarks is to rename
platform_dma_configure to something sensible (firwmare dma configure
maybe?) and use it in all places that do the of & acpi stuff -
pci/amba/platform at least.
Jason
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-28 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-28 2:50 [PATCH v2 00/17] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] iommu: Add device dma ownership set/release interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] driver core: Add dma_unconfigure callback in bus_type Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 8:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-29 4:03 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] PCI: Add driver dma ownership management Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] driver core: platform: " Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 8:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-28 23:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu [this message]
2021-11-29 10:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-29 12:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] amba: " Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] bus: fsl-mc: " Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] PCI: pci_stub: Suppress kernel DMA ownership auto-claiming Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] PCI: portdrv: " Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] iommu: Add security context management for assigned devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] iommu: Expose group variants of dma ownership interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] iommu: Add iommu_at[de]tach_device_shared() for multi-device groups Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] vfio: Set DMA USER ownership for VFIO devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] vfio: Remove use of vfio_group_viable() Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] vfio: Delete the unbound_list Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] vfio: Remove iommu group notifier Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] iommu: Remove iommu group changes notifier Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 2:50 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] drm/tegra: Use the iommu dma_owner mechanism Lu Baolu
2021-11-28 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-29 3:59 ` Lu Baolu
2021-12-06 2:07 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211128231509.GA966332@nvidia.com \
--to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stuyoder@gmail.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox