From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52965C433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A6B610CD; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZb64zMoM9YW; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97E560EA2; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7980EC001D; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B41C0012 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EBB83DF5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2HOOJj81S-Y for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF8583E00 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F2F12FC; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lpieralisi (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B1543F73B; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:12:50 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Shameer Kolothum Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/11] ACPI/IORT: Make iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions() return void Message-ID: <20220406151250.GA27518@lpieralisi> References: <20220404124209.1086-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> <20220404124209.1086-4-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220404124209.1086-4-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Cc: will@kernel.org, jon@solid-run.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, steven.price@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com, guohanjun@huawei.com, yangyicong@huawei.com, Sami.Mujawar@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 01:42:01PM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > At present iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions() returns the number of > MSI reserved regions on success and there are no users for this. > The reserved region list will get populated anyway for platforms > that require the HW MSI region reservation. Hence, change the > function to return void instead. > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum > --- > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- > include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > index fd06cf43ba31..c5ebb2be9a19 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > @@ -832,25 +832,23 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_get_msi_resv_iommu(struct device *dev) > > /** > * iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions - Reserved region driver helper > + * for HW MSI regions. Very minor but is this a spurious change ? > * @dev: Device from iommu_get_resv_regions() > * @head: Reserved region list from iommu_get_resv_regions() > * > - * Returns: Number of msi reserved regions on success (0 if platform > - * doesn't require the reservation or no associated msi regions), > - * appropriate error value otherwise. The ITS interrupt translation > - * spaces (ITS_base + SZ_64K, SZ_64K) associated with the device > - * are the msi reserved regions. > + * The ITS interrupt translation spaces (ITS_base + SZ_64K, SZ_64K) > + * associated with the device are the HW MSI reserved regions. > */ > -int iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head) > +void iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head) > { > struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > struct acpi_iort_its_group *its; > struct acpi_iort_node *iommu_node, *its_node = NULL; > - int i, resv = 0; > + int i; > > iommu_node = iort_get_msi_resv_iommu(dev); > if (!iommu_node) > - return 0; > + return; > > /* > * Current logic to reserve ITS regions relies on HW topologies > @@ -870,7 +868,7 @@ int iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head) > } > > if (!its_node) > - return 0; > + return; > > /* Move to ITS specific data */ > its = (struct acpi_iort_its_group *)its_node->node_data; > @@ -884,14 +882,10 @@ int iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head) > > region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(base + SZ_64K, SZ_64K, > prot, IOMMU_RESV_MSI); > - if (region) { > + if (region) > list_add_tail(®ion->list, head); > - resv++; > - } > } > } > - > - return (resv == its->its_count) ? resv : -ENODEV; > } > > static inline bool iort_iommu_driver_enabled(u8 type) > @@ -1058,8 +1052,8 @@ int iort_iommu_configure_id(struct device *dev, const u32 *id_in) > } > > #else > -int iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head) > -{ return 0; } > +void iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head) > +{ } > int iort_iommu_configure_id(struct device *dev, const u32 *input_id) > { return -ENODEV; } > #endif > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi_iort.h b/include/linux/acpi_iort.h > index f1f0842a2cb2..a8198b83753d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/acpi_iort.h > +++ b/include/linux/acpi_iort.h > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id); > /* IOMMU interface */ > int iort_dma_get_ranges(struct device *dev, u64 *size); > int iort_iommu_configure_id(struct device *dev, const u32 *id_in); > -int iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head); > +void iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head); > phys_addr_t acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void); > #else > static inline void acpi_iort_init(void) { } > @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ static inline int iort_dma_get_ranges(struct device *dev, u64 *size) > static inline int iort_iommu_configure_id(struct device *dev, const u32 *id_in) > { return -ENODEV; } > static inline > -int iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head) > -{ return 0; } > +void iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *head) > +{ } > > static inline phys_addr_t acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void) > { return PHYS_ADDR_MAX; } > -- > 2.25.1 > _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu