Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Wang Zhaoyang1 <zhaoyang1.wang@intel.com>,
	Gao Liang <liang.gao@intel.com>,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, hch@lst.de
Subject: [PATCH] dma-direct: avoid redundant memory sync for swiotlb
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 19:38:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220412113805.3210-1-chao.gao@intel.com> (raw)

When we looked into FIO performance with swiotlb enabled in VM, we found
swiotlb_bounce() is always called one more time than expected for each DMA
read request.

It turns out that the bounce buffer is copied to original DMA buffer twice
after the completion of a DMA request (one is done by in
dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu(), the other by swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single()).
But the content in bounce buffer actually doesn't change between the two
rounds of copy. So, one round of copy is redundant.

Pass DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC flag to swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() to
skip the memory copy in it.

This fix increases FIO 64KB sequential read throughput in a guest with
swiotlb=force by 5.6%.

Reported-by: Wang Zhaoyang1 <zhaoyang1.wang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Gao Liang <liang.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
 kernel/dma/direct.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.h b/kernel/dma/direct.h
index 4632b0f4f72e..8a6cd53dbe8c 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.h
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static inline void dma_direct_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
 		dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, addr, size, dir);
 
 	if (unlikely(is_swiotlb_buffer(dev, phys)))
-		swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
+		swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys, size, dir,
+					 attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
 }
 #endif /* _KERNEL_DMA_DIRECT_H */
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-12 11:38 Chao Gao [this message]
2022-04-12 13:21 ` [PATCH] dma-direct: avoid redundant memory sync for swiotlb Chao Gao
2022-04-12 13:33 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-13  1:02   ` Chao Gao
2022-04-13  4:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-13  5:46       ` Chao Gao
2022-04-13  5:49         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-13 13:10       ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-13 16:44         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220412113805.3210-1-chao.gao@intel.com \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=liang.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=zhaoyang1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox