[PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Drop stop marker messages

[Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>]

The page fault handling framework in the IOMMU core explicitly states
that it doesn't handle PCI PASID Stop Marker and the IOMMU drivers must
discard them before reporting faults. This handles Stop Marker messages
in prq_event_thread() before reporting events to the core.

The VT-d driver explicitly drains the pending page requests when a CPU
page table (represented by a mm struct) is unbound from a PASID according
to the procedures defined in the VT-d spec. The Stop Marker messages do
not need a response. Hence, it is safe to drop the Stop Marker messages
silently if any of them is found in the page request queue.

Fixes: d5b9e4bfe0d88 ("iommu/vt-d: Report prq to io-pgfault framework")
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220421113558.3504874-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index 23a38763c1d1..7ee37d996e15 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -757,6 +757,10 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
 			goto bad_req;
 		}
 
+		/* Drop Stop Marker message. No need for a response. */
+		if (unlikely(req->lpig && !req->rd_req && !req->wr_req))
+			goto prq_advance;
+
 		if (!svm || svm->pasid != req->pasid) {
 			/*
 			 * It can't go away, because the driver is not permitted
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu