Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Badger <ebadger@purestorage.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"open list:INTEL IOMMU (VT-d)" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Check for non-NULL domain on device release
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:40:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240221154012.GC13491@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7455b538-e934-4377-9ab5-004ee991b3d2@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 03:10:53PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> I like this suggestion.
> 
> Currently, the device_release callback for an iommu driver does the
> following:
> 
> a) Silent IOMMU DMA translation. This is done by detaching the existing
>    domain from the IOMMU and bringing the IOMMU into a blocking state
>    (some drivers might be in identity state);
> b) Releases the resources allocated in the probe callback and restores
>    the device to its previous state before the probe.
> 
> From my understanding of your suggestion, we should move a) out of the
> release callback and make it a special domain, which could be a blocking
> domain or identity domain, depending on the iommu hardware.
> 
> In the end, the release_device callback of an iommu driver should focus
> on the opposite operation of device_probe. This makes the concept
> clearer.

Right

Can someone make some patches to fix Eric's bug? We don't really need
to do the release_domain stuff if the driver just self-attaches one of
its known static domain types (blocking/identity)

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-13 18:17 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Check for non-NULL domain on device release Eric Badger
2024-01-16 15:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 23:15   ` Eric Badger
2024-01-17  1:57   ` Robin Murphy
2024-01-17  2:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31  7:10   ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-21 15:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-02-22 11:53       ` Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240221154012.GC13491@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=ebadger@purestorage.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox