From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V1 4/4] iommufd: update VA
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 09:54:13 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240806125413.GI478300@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bb35338-f7a1-46f8-b439-5a3be0ca274d@oracle.com>
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:02:22PM -0400, Steven Sistare wrote:
> On 7/22/2024 11:51 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 11:56:45AM -0700, Steve Sistare wrote:
> > > @@ -458,6 +459,76 @@ static void change_mm(struct iopt_pages *pages)
> > > free_uid(old_user);
> > > }
> > > +#define MAX_UMAP_ENTRIES 1024
> >
> > Only 170 of these fit in a 4k page :\
> >
> > Are you worried about the high order allocation this could trigger?
>
> Should I worry?
Probably? Experiance shows busy servers cannot do a high order
allocation, even order 4 is likely to fail due to fragmentation. If
you imagine you will need more than 1-4 pages of this then it would
probably be a good idea to avoid the higher order allocation.,
> I define a max to guard against a DOS from userland requesting a huge number
> of entries and causing the driver to allocate a huge amount of memory.
>
> The use cases I have seen only have dozens of entries. Do you have a figure
> in mind for the upper bound?
Then it is probably fine as is
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-06 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-20 18:56 [RFC V1 0/4] iommufd live update Steve Sistare
2024-07-20 18:56 ` [RFC V1 1/4] iommufd: Export do_update_pinned Steve Sistare
2024-07-20 18:56 ` [RFC V1] iommufd debug print Steve Sistare
2024-07-20 19:01 ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-20 18:56 ` [RFC V1 2/4] iommufd: Lock all objects Steve Sistare
2024-07-22 15:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-05 19:01 ` Steven Sistare
2024-09-26 14:00 ` Steven Sistare
2024-07-20 18:56 ` [RFC V1 3/4] iommufd: Add IOMMU_IOAS_CHANGE_PROCESS Steve Sistare
2024-07-20 18:56 ` [RFC V1 4/4] iommufd: update VA Steve Sistare
2024-07-22 15:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-05 19:02 ` Steven Sistare
2024-08-06 12:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-07-20 19:21 ` [RFC V1 0/4] iommufd live update Steven Sistare
2024-07-22 15:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-05 19:03 ` Steven Sistare
2024-08-06 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-08 19:15 ` Steven Sistare
2024-08-08 19:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-12 17:41 ` Steven Sistare
2024-08-19 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 17:54 ` Steven Sistare
2024-08-21 18:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-22 21:05 ` Steven Sistare
2024-08-22 21:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-23 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-05 19:02 ` Steven Sistare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240806125413.GI478300@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox