From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM SMMU
DRIVERS), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Optimise non-coherent unmap"
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 05:49:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240905124956.84932-1-robdclark@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
This reverts commit 85b715a334583488ad7fbd3001fe6fd617b7d4c0.
It was causing gpu smmu faults on x1e80100.
I _think_ what is causing this is the change in ordering of
__arm_lpae_clear_pte() (dma_sync_single_for_device() on the pgtable
memory) and io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk(). I'm not entirely sure how
this patch is supposed to work correctly in the face of other
concurrent translations (to buffers unrelated to the one being
unmapped(), because after the io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk() we can have
stale data read back into the tlb.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
index 16e51528772d..85261baa3a04 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
@@ -274,13 +274,13 @@ static void __arm_lpae_sync_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, int num_entries,
sizeof(*ptep) * num_entries, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
}
-static void __arm_lpae_clear_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, int num_entries)
+static void __arm_lpae_clear_pte(arm_lpae_iopte *ptep, struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg)
{
- for (int i = 0; i < num_entries; i++)
- ptep[i] = 0;
- if (!cfg->coherent_walk && num_entries)
- __arm_lpae_sync_pte(ptep, num_entries, cfg);
+ *ptep = 0;
+
+ if (!cfg->coherent_walk)
+ __arm_lpae_sync_pte(ptep, 1, cfg);
}
static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
@@ -653,28 +653,25 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
max_entries = ARM_LPAE_PTES_PER_TABLE(data) - unmap_idx_start;
num_entries = min_t(int, pgcount, max_entries);
- /* Find and handle non-leaf entries */
- for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
- pte = READ_ONCE(ptep[i]);
+ while (i < num_entries) {
+ pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
if (WARN_ON(!pte))
break;
- if (!iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) {
- __arm_lpae_clear_pte(&ptep[i], &iop->cfg, 1);
+ __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg);
+ if (!iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) {
/* Also flush any partial walks */
io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk(iop, iova + i * size, size,
ARM_LPAE_GRANULE(data));
__arm_lpae_free_pgtable(data, lvl + 1, iopte_deref(pte, data));
+ } else if (!iommu_iotlb_gather_queued(gather)) {
+ io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, iova + i * size, size);
}
- }
- /* Clear the remaining entries */
- __arm_lpae_clear_pte(ptep, &iop->cfg, i);
-
- if (gather && !iommu_iotlb_gather_queued(gather))
- for (int j = 0; j < i; j++)
- io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, iova + j * size, size);
+ ptep++;
+ i++;
+ }
return i * size;
} else if (iopte_leaf(pte, lvl, iop->fmt)) {
--
2.46.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 12:49 Rob Clark [this message]
2024-09-05 13:24 ` [PATCH] Revert "iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Optimise non-coherent unmap" Robin Murphy
2024-09-05 13:32 ` Robin Murphy
2024-09-05 13:57 ` Rob Clark
2024-09-05 16:22 ` Robin Murphy
2024-09-05 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2024-09-05 16:27 ` Robin Murphy
2024-09-05 17:00 ` Rob Clark
2024-09-05 17:10 ` Rob Clark
2024-09-06 12:24 ` Robin Murphy
2024-09-06 14:49 ` Rob Clark
2024-09-06 10:56 ` Will Deacon
2024-09-06 15:25 ` Robin Murphy
2024-09-09 14:50 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240905124956.84932-1-robdclark@gmail.com \
--to=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=amhetre@nvidia.com \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox