From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
<yi.l.liu@intel.com>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Vasant Hegde" <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 11/12] iommu: Put domain allocation in __iommu_group_alloc_blocking_domain()
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:38:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241028093810.5901-12-vasant.hegde@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241028093810.5901-1-vasant.hegde@amd.com>
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
There is no longer a reason to call __iommu_domain_alloc() to allocate
the blocking domain. All drivers that support a native blocking domain
provide it via the ops, for other drivers we should call
iommu_paging_domain_alloc().
__iommu_group_alloc_blocking_domain() is the only place that allocates
an BLOCKED domain, so move the ops->blocked_domain logic there.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index a7286c406170..4677b676bd0b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -1985,8 +1985,6 @@ static struct iommu_domain *__iommu_domain_alloc(const struct iommu_ops *ops,
if (alloc_type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY && ops->identity_domain)
return ops->identity_domain;
- else if (alloc_type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED && ops->blocked_domain)
- return ops->blocked_domain;
else if (type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING && ops->domain_alloc_paging)
domain = ops->domain_alloc_paging(dev);
else if (ops->domain_alloc)
@@ -3212,22 +3210,25 @@ void iommu_device_unuse_default_domain(struct device *dev)
static int __iommu_group_alloc_blocking_domain(struct iommu_group *group)
{
+ struct device *dev = iommu_group_first_dev(group);
+ const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev_iommu_ops(dev);
struct iommu_domain *domain;
if (group->blocking_domain)
return 0;
- domain = __iommu_group_domain_alloc(group, IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED);
- if (IS_ERR(domain)) {
- /*
- * For drivers that do not yet understand IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED
- * create an empty domain instead.
- */
- domain = __iommu_group_domain_alloc(group,
- IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED);
- if (IS_ERR(domain))
- return PTR_ERR(domain);
+ if (ops->blocked_domain) {
+ group->blocking_domain = ops->blocked_domain;
+ return 0;
}
+
+ /*
+ * For drivers that do not yet understand IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED create an
+ * empty PAGING domain instead.
+ */
+ domain = iommu_paging_domain_alloc(dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(domain))
+ return PTR_ERR(domain);
group->blocking_domain = domain;
return 0;
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-28 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-28 9:37 [PATCH v5 00/12] iommu: Domain allocation enhancements Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] iommu: Refactor __iommu_domain_alloc() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] iommu: Introduce iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] iommu: Add new flag to explictly request PASID capable domain Vasant Hegde
2024-10-30 14:14 ` Yi Liu
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enhance domain_alloc_user() to allocate " Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] iommu/amd: Add helper function to check GIOSUP/GTSUP Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] iommu/amd: Move V2 page table support check to early_amd_iommu_init() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] iommu/amd: Separate page table setup from domain allocation Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] iommu/amd: Pass page table type as param to pdom_setup_pgtable() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] iommu/amd: Enhance amd_iommu_domain_alloc_user() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 15:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] iommu/amd: Implement global identity domain Vasant Hegde
2024-10-28 9:38 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2024-10-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] iommu: Create __iommu_alloc_identity_domain() Vasant Hegde
2024-10-29 9:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-10-29 10:06 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-29 10:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2024-10-29 11:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-29 16:34 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-10-29 9:09 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] iommu: Domain allocation enhancements Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241028093810.5901-12-vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox