From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
galshalom@nvidia.com, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, maorg@nvidia.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
tdave@nvidia.com, Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe switches
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:09:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250718180947.GB2394663@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b1f12e0-9113-41c4-accb-d8ab755cc7d7@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 06:03:42PM -0400, Donald Dutile wrote:
> > +static struct iommu_group *pci_get_alias_group(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> So, the former pci_device_group() is completely re-written below,
> and what it use to do is renamed pci_get_alias_group(), which shouldn't be
> (easily) confused with ...
>
> > +{
> > + struct iommu_group *group;
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(devfns, 256) = {};
> > /*
> > * Look for existing groups on device aliases. If we alias another
> > * device or another device aliases us, use the same group.
> > */
> > - group = get_pci_alias_group(pdev, (unsigned long *)devfns);
> > + group = get_pci_alias_group(pdev, devfns);
> ... get_pci_alias_group() ?
>
> ... and it's only used for PCIe case below (in pci_device_group), so
> should it be named 'pcie_get_alias_group()' ?
Well, the naming is alot better after this is reworked with the
reachable set patch and these two functions are removed.
But even then I guess it is not a great name.
How about:
/*
* Return a group if the function has isolation restrictions related to
* aliases or MFD ACS.
*/
static struct iommu_group *pci_get_function_group(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
> > +static struct iommu_group *pci_hierarchy_group(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> although static, could you provide a function description for its purpose ?
/* Return a group if the upstream hierarchy has isolation restrictions. */
> > + /*
> > + * !self is only for SRIOV virtual busses which should have been
> > + * excluded above.
> by pci_is_root_bus() ?? -- that checks if bus->parent exists...
> not sure how that excludes the case of !bus->self ...
Should be this:
/*
* !self is only for SRIOV virtual busses which should have been
* excluded by pci_physfn()
*/
if (WARN_ON(!bus->self))
> > + */
> > + if (WARN_ON(!bus->self))
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > + group = iommu_group_get(&bus->self->dev);
> > + if (!group) {
> > + /*
> > + * If the upstream bridge needs the same group as pdev then
> > + * there is no way for it's pci_device_group() to discover it.
> > + */
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > + "PCI device is probing out of order, upstream bridge device of %s is not probed yet\n",
> > + pci_name(bus->self));
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> > + }
> > + if (group->bus_data & BUS_DATA_PCI_NON_ISOLATED)
> > + return group;
> > + iommu_group_put(group);
> > + return NULL;
> ... and w/o the function description, I don't follow:
> -- rtn an iommu-group if it has NON_ISOLATED property ... but rtn null if all devices below it are isolated?
Yes. For all these internal functions non null means we found a group
to join, NULL means to keep checking isolation rules.
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-18 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 14:52 [PATCH v2 00/16] Fix incorrect iommu_groups with PCIe ACS Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] PCI: Move REQ_ACS_FLAGS into pci_regs.h as PCI_ACS_ISOLATED Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] PCI: Add pci_bus_isolation() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe switches Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 22:03 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 18:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-07-18 19:00 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 20:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-18 21:41 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 22:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] iommu: Organize iommu_group by member size Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] PCI: Add pci_reachable_set() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 22:04 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 17:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-18 19:10 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] PCI: Remove duplication in calling pci_acs_ctrl_enabled() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] PCI: Use pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs() for pci_quirk_amd_sb_acs() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] PCI: Use pci_acs_ctrl_isolated() for pci_quirk_al_acs() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] PCI: Widen the acs_flags to u32 within the quirk callback Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] PCI: Add pci_mfd_isolation() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-20 17:21 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] iommu: Compute iommu_groups properly for PCIe MFDs Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-28 9:47 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-07-28 13:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] iommu: Validate that pci_for_each_dma_alias() matches the groups Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 22:07 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] PCI: Add the ACS Enhanced Capability definitions Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] PCI: Enable ACS Enhanced bits for enable_acs and config_acs Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] PCI: Check ACS DSP/USP redirect bits in pci_enable_pasid() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-17 22:17 ` Donald Dutile
2025-07-18 17:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 4:39 ` Askar Safin
2025-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] PCI: Check ACS Extended flags for pci_bus_isolated() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-18 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] Fix incorrect iommu_groups with PCIe ACS Alex Williamson
2025-07-18 22:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-02 1:45 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-02 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 3:43 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-05 12:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-05 14:41 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-05 14:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-06 2:22 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-06 2:41 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-06 13:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-07 1:36 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-08 7:56 ` Ethan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250718180947.GB2394663@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=galshalom@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
--cc=tony.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox