From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
jgg@nvidia.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, miko.lenczewski@arm.com,
balbirs@nvidia.com, peterz@infradead.org, smostafa@google.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, praan@google.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv2 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain arm_smmu_invs array
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 21:01:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509092020.mxUyqGcN-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80310b98efa4bd7e95d7b3ca302f40d4d69e59c5.1757373449.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Hi Nicolin,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.17-rc5 next-20250909]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nicolin-Chen/iommu-arm-smmu-v3-Clear-cmds-num-after-arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit/20250909-073052
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/80310b98efa4bd7e95d7b3ca302f40d4d69e59c5.1757373449.git.nicolinc%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [PATCH rfcv2 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain arm_smmu_invs array
config: arm64-randconfig-003-20250909 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250909/202509092020.mxUyqGcN-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250909/202509092020.mxUyqGcN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509092020.mxUyqGcN-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1082:23: error: static declaration of 'arm_smmu_invs_merge' follows non-static declaration
1082 | struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_merge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:34:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h:721:23: note: previous declaration of 'arm_smmu_invs_merge' with type 'struct arm_smmu_invs *(struct arm_smmu_invs *, struct arm_smmu_invs *)'
721 | struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_merge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1165:8: error: static declaration of 'arm_smmu_invs_unref' follows non-static declaration
1165 | size_t arm_smmu_invs_unref(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:34:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h:723:8: note: previous declaration of 'arm_smmu_invs_unref' with type 'size_t(struct arm_smmu_invs *, struct arm_smmu_invs *)' {aka 'long unsigned int(struct arm_smmu_invs *, struct arm_smmu_invs *)'}
723 | size_t arm_smmu_invs_unref(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1215:23: error: static declaration of 'arm_smmu_invs_purge' follows non-static declaration
1215 | struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_purge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:34:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h:725:23: note: previous declaration of 'arm_smmu_invs_purge' with type 'struct arm_smmu_invs *(struct arm_smmu_invs *, size_t)' {aka 'struct arm_smmu_invs *(struct arm_smmu_invs *, long unsigned int)'}
725 | struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_purge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1215:23: warning: 'arm_smmu_invs_purge' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1215 | struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_purge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1165:8: warning: 'arm_smmu_invs_unref' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1165 | size_t arm_smmu_invs_unref(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1082:23: warning: 'arm_smmu_invs_merge' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1082 | struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_merge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/arm_smmu_invs_merge +1082 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
1063
1064 /**
1065 * arm_smmu_invs_merge() - Merge @to_merge into @invs and generate a new array
1066 * @invs: the base invalidation array
1067 * @to_merge: an array of invlidations to merge
1068 *
1069 * Return: a newly allocated array on success, or ERR_PTR
1070 *
1071 * This function must be locked and serialized with arm_smmu_invs_unref() and
1072 * arm_smmu_invs_purge(), but do not lockdep on any lock for KUNIT test.
1073 *
1074 * Either @invs or @to_merge must be sorted itself. This ensures the returned
1075 * array will be sorted as well.
1076 *
1077 * Caller is resposible for freeing the @invs and the returned new one.
1078 *
1079 * Entries marked as trash will be purged in the returned array.
1080 */
1081 VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
> 1082 struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_merge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
1083 struct arm_smmu_invs *to_merge)
1084 {
1085 struct arm_smmu_invs *new_invs;
1086 struct arm_smmu_inv *new;
1087 size_t num_adds = 0;
1088 size_t num_dels = 0;
1089 size_t i, j;
1090
1091 for (i = j = 0; i != invs->num_invs || j != to_merge->num_invs;) {
1092 int cmp = arm_smmu_invs_merge_cmp(invs, i, to_merge, j);
1093
1094 if (cmp < 0) {
1095 /* no found in to_merge, leave alone but delete trash */
1096 if (!refcount_read(&invs->inv[i].users))
1097 num_dels++;
1098 i++;
1099 } else if (cmp == 0) {
1100 /* same item */
1101 i++;
1102 j++;
1103 } else {
1104 /* unique to to_merge */
1105 num_adds++;
1106 j++;
1107 }
1108 }
1109
1110 new_invs = arm_smmu_invs_alloc(invs->num_invs - num_dels + num_adds);
1111 if (IS_ERR(new_invs))
1112 return new_invs;
1113
1114 new = new_invs->inv;
1115 for (i = j = 0; i != invs->num_invs || j != to_merge->num_invs;) {
1116 int cmp = arm_smmu_invs_merge_cmp(invs, i, to_merge, j);
1117
1118 if (cmp <= 0 && !refcount_read(&invs->inv[i].users)) {
1119 i++;
1120 continue;
1121 }
1122
1123 if (cmp < 0) {
1124 *new = invs->inv[i];
1125 i++;
1126 } else if (cmp == 0) {
1127 *new = invs->inv[i];
1128 refcount_inc(&new->users);
1129 i++;
1130 j++;
1131 } else {
1132 *new = to_merge->inv[j];
1133 refcount_set(&new->users, 1);
1134 j++;
1135 }
1136 new++;
1137 }
1138
1139 WARN_ON(new != new_invs->inv + new_invs->num_invs);
1140
1141 return new_invs;
1142 }
1143 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arm_smmu_invs_merge);
1144
1145 /**
1146 * arm_smmu_invs_unref() - Find in @invs for all entries in @to_unref, decrease
1147 * the user counts without deletions
1148 * @invs: the base invalidation array
1149 * @to_unref: an array of invlidations to decrease their user counts
1150 *
1151 * Return: the number of trash entries in the array, for arm_smmu_invs_purge()
1152 *
1153 * This function will not fail. Any entry with users=0 will be marked as trash.
1154 * All trash entries will remain in the @invs until being completely deleted by
1155 * the next arm_smmu_invs_merge() or an arm_smmu_invs_purge() function call.
1156 *
1157 * This function must be locked and serialized with arm_smmu_invs_merge() and
1158 * arm_smmu_invs_purge(), but do not lockdep on any lock for KUNIT test.
1159 *
1160 * Note that the @invs->num_invs will not be updated, even if the actual number
1161 * of invalidations are decreased. Readers should take the read lock to iterate
1162 * each entry and check its users counter until @inv->num_invs.
1163 */
1164 VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
> 1165 size_t arm_smmu_invs_unref(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
1166 struct arm_smmu_invs *to_unref)
1167 {
1168 size_t num_dels = 0;
1169 size_t i, j;
1170
1171 for (i = j = 0; i != invs->num_invs || j != to_unref->num_invs;) {
1172 int cmp;
1173
1174 if (!refcount_read(&invs->inv[i].users)) {
1175 num_dels++;
1176 i++;
1177 continue;
1178 }
1179
1180 cmp = arm_smmu_invs_merge_cmp(invs, i, to_unref, j);
1181 if (cmp < 0) {
1182 /* not found in to_unref, leave alone */
1183 i++;
1184 } else if (cmp == 0) {
1185 /* same item */
1186 if (refcount_dec_and_test(&invs->inv[i].users))
1187 num_dels++;
1188 i++;
1189 j++;
1190 } else {
1191 /* item in to_unref is not in invs or already a trash */
1192 WARN_ON(true);
1193 j++;
1194 }
1195 }
1196 return num_dels;
1197 }
1198 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arm_smmu_invs_unref);
1199
1200 /**
1201 * arm_smmu_invs_purge() - Purge all the trash entries in the @invs
1202 * @invs: the base invalidation array
1203 * @num_dels: expected number of trash entries, typically the return value from
1204 * a prior arm_smmu_invs_unref() call
1205 *
1206 * Return: a newly allocated array on success removing all the trash entries, or
1207 * NULL on failure
1208 *
1209 * This function must be locked and serialized with arm_smmu_invs_merge() and
1210 * arm_smmu_invs_unref(), but do not lockdep on any lock for KUNIT test.
1211 *
1212 * Caller is resposible for freeing the @invs and the returned new one.
1213 */
1214 VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
> 1215 struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_invs_purge(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
1216 size_t num_dels)
1217 {
1218 struct arm_smmu_invs *new_invs;
1219 size_t i, j;
1220
1221 if (WARN_ON(invs->num_invs < num_dels))
1222 return NULL;
1223
1224 new_invs = arm_smmu_invs_alloc(invs->num_invs - num_dels);
1225 if (IS_ERR(new_invs))
1226 return NULL;
1227
1228 for (i = j = 0; i != invs->num_invs; i++) {
1229 if (!refcount_read(&invs->inv[i].users))
1230 continue;
1231 new_invs->inv[j] = invs->inv[i];
1232 j++;
1233 }
1234
1235 WARN_ON(j != new_invs->num_invs);
1236 return new_invs;
1237 }
1238 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arm_smmu_invs_purge);
1239
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 23:26 [PATCH rfcv2 0/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce an RCU-protected invalidation array Nicolin Chen
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 1/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Clear cmds->num after arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09 3:16 ` Balbir Singh
2025-09-09 5:42 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09 22:49 ` Balbir Singh
2025-09-10 2:03 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-10 2:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 2/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Explicitly set smmu_domain->stage for SVA Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09 3:25 ` Balbir Singh
2025-09-09 22:31 ` Balbir Singh
2025-09-10 2:06 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add an inline arm_smmu_domain_free() Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain arm_smmu_invs array Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09 13:01 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-09-20 0:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 18:52 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-30 12:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pre-allocate a per-master invalidation array Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 19:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-30 11:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-08 23:27 ` [PATCH rfcv2 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate smmu_domain->invs when attaching masters Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 20:52 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-30 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-30 20:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-01 16:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-01 17:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-08 23:27 ` [PATCH rfcv2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_invs based arm_smmu_domain_inv_range() Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 21:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-08 23:27 ` [PATCH rfcv2 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Perform per-domain invalidations using arm_smmu_invs Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202509092020.mxUyqGcN-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox