From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
robin.murphy@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: ada.coupriediaz@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
ardb@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, surenb@google.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com,
zhengtangquan@oppo.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 14:04:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251219060452.85288-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219053658.84978-1-21cnbao@gmail.com>
From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
For reasons unclear, the cover letter was omitted from the
initial posting, despite Gmail indicating it was sent. This
is a resend. Apologies for the noise.
Many embedded ARM64 SoCs still lack hardware cache coherency support, which
causes DMA mapping operations to appear as hotspots in on-CPU flame graphs.
For an SG list with *nents* entries, the current dma_map/unmap_sg() and DMA
sync APIs perform cache maintenance one entry at a time. After each entry,
the implementation synchronously waits for the corresponding region’s
D-cache operations to complete. On architectures like arm64, efficiency can
be improved by issuing all entries’ operations first and then performing a
single batched wait for completion.
Tangquan's results show that batched synchronization can reduce
dma_map_sg() time by 64.61% and dma_unmap_sg() time by 66.60% on an MTK
phone platform (MediaTek Dimensity 9500). The tests were performed by
pinning the task to CPU7 and fixing the CPU frequency at 2.6 GHz,
running dma_map_sg() and dma_unmap_sg() on 10 MB buffers (10 MB / 4 KB
sg entries per buffer) for 200 iterations and then averaging the
results.
I also ran this patch set on an RK3588 Rock5B+ board and
observed that millions of DMA sync operations were batched.
diff with RFC:
* Dropped lots of #ifdef/#else/#endif according to Catalin and Marek,
thanks!
* Also add iova link/unlink batches, which is marked as RFC as i lack
hardware. This is suggested by Marek, thanks!
RFC link:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251029023115.22809-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/
Barry Song (6):
arm64: Provide dcache_by_myline_op_nosync helper
arm64: Provide dcache_clean_poc_nosync helper
arm64: Provide dcache_inval_poc_nosync helper
arm64: Provide arch_sync_dma_ batched helpers
dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the
arch
dma-iommu: Allow DMA sync batching for IOVA link/unlink
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++-------
arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 2 +
arch/arm64/mm/cache.S | 58 +++++++++++++++----
arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 24 ++++++++
drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 12 +++-
include/linux/dma-map-ops.h | 22 ++++++++
kernel/dma/Kconfig | 3 +
kernel/dma/direct.c | 28 +++++++---
kernel/dma/direct.h | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
10 files changed, 262 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-19 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 5:36 [PATCH 0/6] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Provide dcache_by_myline_op_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 12:20 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-21 7:22 ` Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Provide dcache_clean_poc_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64: Provide dcache_inval_poc_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-12-19 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2025-12-21 7:59 ` Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: Provide arch_sync_dma_ batched helpers Barry Song
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch Barry Song
2025-12-20 17:37 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-21 5:15 ` Barry Song
2025-12-21 11:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-21 19:24 ` Barry Song
2025-12-22 8:49 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-23 0:02 ` Barry Song
2025-12-23 2:36 ` Barry Song
2025-12-23 14:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-24 1:29 ` Barry Song
2025-12-24 8:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-25 5:45 ` Barry Song
2025-12-25 12:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-25 13:31 ` Barry Song
2025-12-25 13:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-12-21 12:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 12:43 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 14:00 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-19 5:36 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] dma-iommu: Allow DMA sync batching for IOVA link/unlink Barry Song
2025-12-19 6:04 ` Barry Song [this message]
2025-12-19 6:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251219060452.85288-1-21cnbao@gmail.com \
--to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox