From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org>,
Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Flush dev-IOTLB only when PCIe device is accessible in scalable mode
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:48:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260122014856.2457052-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122014856.2457052-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
From: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
Commit 4fc82cd907ac ("iommu/vt-d: Don't issue ATS Invalidation
request when device is disconnected") relies on
pci_dev_is_disconnected() to skip ATS invalidation for
safely-removed devices, but it does not cover link-down caused
by faults, which can still hard-lock the system.
For example, if a VM fails to connect to the PCIe device,
"virsh destroy" is executed to release resources and isolate
the fault, but a hard-lockup occurs while releasing the group fd.
Call Trace:
qi_submit_sync
qi_flush_dev_iotlb
intel_pasid_tear_down_entry
device_block_translation
blocking_domain_attach_dev
__iommu_attach_device
__iommu_device_set_domain
__iommu_group_set_domain_internal
iommu_detach_group
vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group
vfio_group_detach_container
vfio_group_fops_release
__fput
Although pci_device_is_present() is slower than
pci_dev_is_disconnected(), it still takes only ~70 µs on a
ConnectX-5 (8 GT/s, x2) and becomes even faster as PCIe speed
and width increase.
Besides, devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid() is called only in the
paths below, which are far less frequent than memory map/unmap.
1. mm-struct release
2. {attach,release}_dev
3. set/remove PASID
4. dirty-tracking setup
The gain in system stability far outweighs the negligible cost
of using pci_device_is_present() instead of pci_dev_is_disconnected()
to decide when to skip ATS invalidation, especially under GDR
high-load conditions.
Fixes: 4fc82cd907ac ("iommu/vt-d: Don't issue ATS Invalidation request when device is disconnected")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jinhui Guo <guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251211035946.2071-3-guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
index 3f6d78180d79..99692f88b883 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
if (!info || !info->ats_enabled)
return;
- if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(to_pci_dev(dev)))
+ if (!pci_device_is_present(to_pci_dev(dev)))
return;
sid = PCI_DEVID(info->bus, info->devfn);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-22 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 1:48 [PATCH 0/7] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v6.20 Lu Baolu
2026-01-22 1:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Skip dev-iotlb flush for inaccessible PCIe device without scalable mode Lu Baolu
2026-01-22 1:48 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2026-01-22 1:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Flush cache for PASID table before using it Lu Baolu
2026-01-22 1:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Flush piotlb for SVM and Nested domain Lu Baolu
2026-01-22 1:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down PASID entry Lu Baolu
2026-01-22 1:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down context entry Lu Baolu
2026-01-22 1:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix race condition during PASID entry replacement Lu Baolu
2026-01-22 8:20 ` [PATCH 0/7] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v6.20 Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260122014856.2457052-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmaluka@chromium.org \
--cc=guojinhui.liam@bytedance.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox