From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Fix intel iommu iotlb sync hardlockup and retry
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:16:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316071640.347227-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316071640.347227-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
From: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
During the qi_check_fault process after an IOMMU ITE event, requests at
odd-numbered positions in the queue are set to QI_ABORT, only satisfying
single-request submissions. However, qi_submit_sync now supports multiple
simultaneous submissions, and can't guarantee that the wait_desc will be
at an odd-numbered position. Therefore, if an item times out, IOMMU can't
re-initiate the request, resulting in an infinite polling wait.
This modifies the process by setting the status of all requests already
fetched by IOMMU and recorded as QI_IN_USE status (including wait_desc
requests) to QI_ABORT, thus enabling multiple requests to be resubmitted.
Fixes: 8a1d82462540 ("iommu/vt-d: Multiple descriptors per qi_submit_sync()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
Tested-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260306101516.3885775-1-guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index d68c06025cac..69222dbd2af0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -1314,7 +1314,6 @@ static int qi_check_fault(struct intel_iommu *iommu, int index, int wait_index)
if (fault & DMA_FSTS_ITE) {
head = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_IQH_REG);
head = ((head >> shift) - 1 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
- head |= 1;
tail = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_IQT_REG);
tail = ((tail >> shift) - 1 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
@@ -1331,7 +1330,7 @@ static int qi_check_fault(struct intel_iommu *iommu, int index, int wait_index)
do {
if (qi->desc_status[head] == QI_IN_USE)
qi->desc_status[head] = QI_ABORT;
- head = (head - 2 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
+ head = (head - 1 + QI_LENGTH) % QI_LENGTH;
} while (head != tail);
/*
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-16 7:16 [PATCH 0/2] [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v7.0-rc Lu Baolu
2026-03-16 7:16 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2026-03-16 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Only handle IOPF for SVA when PRI is supported Lu Baolu
2026-03-17 12:21 ` [PATCH 0/2] [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v7.0-rc Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260316071640.347227-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox