From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com (mail-pl1-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEDE231E824 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 20:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777407633; cv=none; b=sKA05Gsn+/VpSggUYo5nT51f+SurdTVXAfKx5C0M42GcvgrGBJSTsaIx5WDqvyjfJO4TeZ2I/I3UINtLWWHzAc3fEMzddpvziVpEEdg3PCkWjMCl8waxT6Enzugqfji2y+9XvjrVq0sMjlTmYgcDtsUnEzBcYa6EptbX8kNd2a8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777407633; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+4M4htXEh/xXtFiCFXN/m9StERkAgWTPW4y6jMSwAUs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZZ2+4lQMDvEWrJHqq/ewgCt/oFRKRnvvgIZFf6jWA+LfNz3e5ho3jImar/YwuGfyW6okrXBpet+QL83Z6drHCwI/cSnJMGS1yGtlUAc7gkWPpQXfmUTnQTUxZYYoJqDPAvGXhQRS4g/xg5v0uNBZr7uZVN1xBBkJSXD6Nzsk7R8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=pVnXnjoY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="pVnXnjoY" Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b243198058so14005ad.1 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1777407631; x=1778012431; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MaR4AuPDQzq9MeZ+Bqr1j2DtvJljfw3TYQa7ZG83Cs8=; b=pVnXnjoYZKYvyhtlTb5zwUrHH2syhOCdbOf3EQBhEd7RC73KahXlyTbl8MtMly+QRV tWveYGytGoz+WOJNXV+62BzCvPb/Vfi0lmgmfOa7lqFp4K1CWkZujp+zCEOlqP+X/085 7CS4co5Txik9ArqmuXSchQr5gnVf5lvHam2gYu+sOQhK1u28CUVGONdYTr+pLg6q9Nmj go9mTtGXDCO7cXQcQuOqHlZMUHAqBHvdLt4vCbgMf3OE2bx8ajD+yjraNm1aoPsRX6cP sKhezXRFGOoucygoD+v0p2WqNNgYuknX9V5pUhwIgat1MlUjxPthZeSuMqQUJldxXKHI +5Pg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1777407631; x=1778012431; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MaR4AuPDQzq9MeZ+Bqr1j2DtvJljfw3TYQa7ZG83Cs8=; b=iwPQxr/JPd33OTz6Sn9geAqqYsOXbG/3DxcfIjyAAlpd/g6zuEZ8E7qJxTeH3vHMwT vcfPLt/k1LU6X65KeruFyhwMleyI4nWMBNLEfD0Nq5aAxg8wjd00uVatd7Wg8fGi1mm1 0fipi10rKRhCzd39rDEDfT8/uT5V0unzdNnuE8d87l/lehb3069pbHKEyQ/47SwwUvcj dttFnW68JLI1JHAVEXKPYGp7mVQF6kTES9lbWyvBb1ctoVZr8dBldzzX1BHaCvAJQNzD AhRDgxlrZ3MzEJau99j8Ki8xGgG9wOhqLERtUadOteGBpY0htwqZ89hE/Ceoby3d/3UJ EpGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YylYUQ92czZM4+eLYNzDfyNBnGJYwLV0yQ5OlYW5qhpKu+7TgSO dnCsTPi/0p2hMxQdk0nGJBdylu5gGgdfENDDnf0nbt4NLKw6sRVvwD/9WOWvD70llA== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDievQfRWjs1yl0k7WQ1J03/69lg2MSx5E42a9RMj99/AfEYg8OEvu9ZDU97Q5+YG mAj571oGwuEa1an85CTs8/jrmsdBGKmhgLHxydRQbNGHe7til3r2tsPc9QzpTd5K6nQIdJlnOAc /n5qsfGFdCGFkbmc4QcU/nHLZ9JdwtwL/H7igaJIgV9eV4bF4kdxaNFsRfgfrfeuvQSbC3WD7FU NDwcWeQQpnMJfrwQkQMEKrxpvhvyLSBZyq7gfOPTeICwTQhTUIWXoziXwHft+gfJVCRK3h2wYyc fnV8RUxlkBoucz2/qS9GcV3O+hsNEdnRzCjfp4tm04/LbLFF4Qy3MGgbBGNMDxrYMITPlo2T2rS kZyPKd0rgoNvRRXAsT9T3IvEPLyY15zUIH8lBCefyeCyEv6LCeVxWN8Rwl7JjJ/pdR4DybjY0jm T7nl5cbqbF3RtK1YYOOZLQe6fvZJIu/aB/m9VVi8W/7a20fv+9Ry7KxYSxsPYe39QdSbfg3eLyt whs96A= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:db0e:b0:2b4:60e6:44bc with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b988e32430mr88155ad.13.1777407630352; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (60.89.247.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.247.89.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-834dae00d13sm3520508b3a.8.2026.04.28.13.20.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:20:25 -0700 From: Vipin Sharma To: David Matlack Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Adithya Jayachandran , Alexander Graf , Alex Williamson , Bjorn Helgaas , Chris Li , David Rientjes , Jacob Pan , Jason Gunthorpe , Joerg Roedel , Jonathan Corbet , Josh Hilke , Leon Romanovsky , Lukas Wunner , Mike Rapoport , Parav Pandit , Pasha Tatashin , Pranjal Shrivastava , Pratyush Yadav , Robin Murphy , Saeed Mahameed , Samiullah Khawaja , Shuah Khan , Will Deacon , William Tu , Yi Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] PCI: liveupdate: Track outgoing preserved PCI devices Message-ID: <20260428201231.GA3885809.vipinsh@google.com> References: <20260423212316.3431746-1-dmatlack@google.com> <20260423212316.3431746-3-dmatlack@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260423212316.3431746-3-dmatlack@google.com> On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 09:23:06PM +0000, David Matlack wrote: > +int pci_liveupdate_preserve(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > + struct pci_ser *ser; > + int i, ret; > + > + guard(mutex)(&pci_flb_outgoing_lock); > + > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing(&pci_liveupdate_flb, (void **)&ser); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if (!ser) > + return -ENOENT; > + > + if (dev->is_virtfn) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (dev->liveupdate_outgoing) > + return -EBUSY; > + > + if (ser->nr_devices == ser->max_nr_devices) > + return -ENOSPC; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ser->max_nr_devices; i++) { > + /* > + * Start searching at index ser->nr_devices. This should result > + * in a constant time search under expected conditions (devices > + * are not getting unpreserved). > + */ > + int index = (ser->nr_devices + i) % ser->max_nr_devices; > + struct pci_dev_ser *dev_ser = &ser->devices[index]; > + > + if (dev_ser->refcount) > + continue; > + > + pci_info(dev, "Device will be preserved across next Live Update\n"); > + ser->nr_devices++; > + > + dev_ser->domain = pci_domain_nr(dev->bus); > + dev_ser->bdf = pci_dev_id(dev); > + dev_ser->refcount = 1; > + > + dev->liveupdate_outgoing = dev_ser; > + return 0; > + } > + > + return -ENOSPC; Since it is executing under a mutex, and we already failed 'if (ser->nr_devices == ser->max_nr_devices) check above, will we ever reach here and return -ENOSPC? > diff --git a/include/linux/kho/abi/pci.h b/include/linux/kho/abi/pci.h > index 5c0e92588c00..5b4c8d9e462c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kho/abi/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/kho/abi/pci.h > @@ -23,19 +23,20 @@ > * incrementing the version number in the PCI_LUO_FLB_COMPATIBLE string. > */ > > -#define PCI_LUO_FLB_COMPATIBLE "pci-v1" > +#define PCI_LUO_FLB_COMPATIBLE "pci-v2" Just curious, why did we change the version here? It's not like just previous patch is working enough to perform a live update. As the config is experimental, can't we just keep it PCI-v1 for the whole series? >