From: Yuho Choi <oss.patchbox@gmail.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Tomasz Jeznach <tomasz.jeznach@linux.dev>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: iommu: TLB sync timeouts and page table freeing on unmap
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 13:54:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261022175408.52254-2-oss.patchbox@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
While looking at how IOMMU drivers handle TLB invalidation timeouts, I
noticed that several of them only log the timeout and carry on. For
example, ipmmu_tlb_sync() in drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c (v7.3):
if (read_poll_timeout_atomic(ipmmu_ctx_read_root, val,
!(val & IMCTR_FLUSH), 1, TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT,
false, domain, IMCTR))
dev_err_ratelimited(domain->mmu->dev,
"TLB sync timed out -- MMU may be deadlocked\n");
and qcom_iommu_tlb_sync() in drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
does the same. On unmap, __arm_lpae_unmap() in
drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c frees a page table right after the walk
flush:
io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk(iop, iova + i * size, size,
ARM_LPAE_GRANULE(data));
__arm_lpae_free_pgtable(data, lvl + 1, iopte_deref(pte, data));
and the IOMMU core and its callers release the data pages after
->iotlb_sync(). Both callbacks return void, so a driver cannot stop
that when the invalidation did not complete.
Is a TLB sync timeout considered fatal enough that this does not
matter, or would you take changes in this area? For example, a driver
could record the failure and fail later map requests, as [1], or
these callbacks could be allowed to return an error.
This came up during static analysis for research that is not yet
published; I have not seen such a timeout on hardware. I'm happy to
send patches if one of these directions is acceptable.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/e2b13e82-f762-4fb0-83cb-d4bef57be427@linux.dev
Thanks,
Yuho
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 17:54 Yuho Choi [this message]
2026-10-23 15:47 ` iommu: TLB sync timeouts and page table freeing on unmap Robin Murphy
2026-10-23 17:00 ` Yuho Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261022175408.52254-2-oss.patchbox@gmail.com \
--to=oss.patchbox@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tomasz.jeznach@linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox