From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dma-mapping: tidy up dma_parms default handling Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:45:49 +0100 Message-ID: <2031542.TLqIP3YVGc@wuerfel> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Robin Murphy Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, bhelgaas@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Friday 09 January 2015 16:56:03 Robin Murphy wrote: > > This one's a bit tricky to find a home for - I think technically it's > probably an IOMMU patch, but then the long-underlying problem doesn't > seem to have blown up anything until arm64, and my motivation is to > make bits of Juno work, which seems to nudge it towards arm64/arm-soc > territory. Could anyone suggest which tree is most appropriate? I have a set of patches touching various dma-mapping.h related bits across architectures and in ARM in particular. Your patch fits into that series, and I guess we could either have it in my asm-generic tree or in Andrew Morton's mm tree. Possibly also arm-soc for practical reasons, although it really doesn't belong in there. Arnd