From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Detect number of instances at runtime
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:27:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f2039a0-bf7e-9261-62f6-bea118c64b38@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325130332.778208-6-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
On 2021-03-25 13:03, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> Parse the reg property in device tree and detect the number of instances
> represented by a device tree node. This is subsequently needed in order
> to support single-instance SMMUs with the Tegra implementation because
> additional programming is needed to properly configure the SID override
> registers in the memory controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c | 49 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> index 29117444e5a0..5b1170b028f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> @@ -20,13 +20,19 @@
> * The third instance usage is through standard arm-smmu driver itself and
> * is out of scope of this implementation.
> */
> -#define NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES 2
> +#define MAX_SMMU_INSTANCES 2
>
> struct nvidia_smmu {
> - struct arm_smmu_device smmu;
> - void __iomem *bases[NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES];
> + struct arm_smmu_device smmu;
> + void __iomem *bases[MAX_SMMU_INSTANCES];
> + unsigned int num_instances;
Surely it would make more sense to just add a second set of
implementation ops without all the overrides that aren't needed for a
single instance?
Also note that the binding currently requires the Tegra-specific
compatible to have exactly two regions.
Robin.
> };
>
> +static inline struct nvidia_smmu *to_nvidia_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> + return container_of(smmu, struct nvidia_smmu, smmu);
> +}
> +
> static inline void __iomem *nvidia_smmu_page(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> unsigned int inst, int page)
> {
> @@ -47,9 +53,10 @@ static u32 nvidia_smmu_read_reg(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> static void nvidia_smmu_write_reg(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> int page, int offset, u32 val)
> {
> + struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
> unsigned int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < nvidia->num_instances; i++) {
> void __iomem *reg = nvidia_smmu_page(smmu, i, page) + offset;
>
> writel_relaxed(val, reg);
> @@ -67,9 +74,10 @@ static u64 nvidia_smmu_read_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> static void nvidia_smmu_write_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> int page, int offset, u64 val)
> {
> + struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
> unsigned int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < nvidia->num_instances; i++) {
> void __iomem *reg = nvidia_smmu_page(smmu, i, page) + offset;
>
> writeq_relaxed(val, reg);
> @@ -79,6 +87,7 @@ static void nvidia_smmu_write_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> static void nvidia_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> int sync, int status)
> {
> + struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
> unsigned int delay;
>
> arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, 0);
> @@ -90,7 +99,7 @@ static void nvidia_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> u32 val = 0;
> unsigned int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < nvidia->num_instances; i++) {
> void __iomem *reg;
>
> reg = nvidia_smmu_page(smmu, i, page) + status;
> @@ -112,9 +121,10 @@ static void nvidia_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
>
> static int nvidia_smmu_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> + struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
> unsigned int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < nvidia->num_instances; i++) {
> u32 val;
> void __iomem *reg = nvidia_smmu_page(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_GR0) +
> ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR;
> @@ -157,8 +167,9 @@ static irqreturn_t nvidia_smmu_global_fault(int irq, void *dev)
> unsigned int inst;
> irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
> + struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
>
> - for (inst = 0; inst < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; inst++) {
> + for (inst = 0; inst < nvidia->num_instances; inst++) {
> irqreturn_t irq_ret;
>
> irq_ret = nvidia_smmu_global_fault_inst(irq, smmu, inst);
> @@ -202,11 +213,13 @@ static irqreturn_t nvidia_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> struct iommu_domain *domain = dev;
> struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain;
> + struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia;
>
> smmu_domain = container_of(domain, struct arm_smmu_domain, domain);
> smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> + nvidia = to_nvidia_smmu(smmu);
>
> - for (inst = 0; inst < NUM_SMMU_INSTANCES; inst++) {
> + for (inst = 0; inst < nvidia->num_instances; inst++) {
> irqreturn_t irq_ret;
>
> /*
> @@ -241,6 +254,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *nvidia_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> struct device *dev = smmu->dev;
> struct nvidia_smmu *nvidia_smmu;
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + unsigned int i;
>
> nvidia_smmu = devm_krealloc(dev, smmu, sizeof(*nvidia_smmu), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!nvidia_smmu)
> @@ -248,14 +262,19 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *nvidia_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>
> /* Instance 0 is ioremapped by arm-smmu.c. */
> nvidia_smmu->bases[0] = smmu->base;
> + nvidia_smmu->num_instances++;
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < MAX_SMMU_INSTANCES; i++) {
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, i);
> + if (!res)
> + break;
>
> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> - if (!res)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + nvidia_smmu->bases[i] = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(nvidia_smmu->bases[i]))
> + return ERR_CAST(nvidia_smmu->bases[i]);
>
> - nvidia_smmu->bases[1] = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> - if (IS_ERR(nvidia_smmu->bases[1]))
> - return ERR_CAST(nvidia_smmu->bases[1]);
> + nvidia_smmu->num_instances++;
> + }
>
> nvidia_smmu->smmu.impl = &nvidia_smmu_impl;
>
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-25 13:03 [PATCH 0/9] arm64: tegra: Prevent early SMMU faults Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] memory: tegra: Move internal data structures into separate header Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 15:12 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-25 15:52 ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 16:11 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 13:21 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] memory: tegra: Add memory client IDs to tables Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] memory: tegra: Implement SID override programming Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 14:27 ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 15:02 ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement ->probe_finalize() Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 14:27 ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Detect number of instances at runtime Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 14:27 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Implement SID override programming Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Use Tegra implementation on Tegra186 Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 14:27 ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: tegra: Hook up memory controller to SMMU " Thierry Reding
2021-03-25 13:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: tegra: Enable SMMU support on Tegra194 Thierry Reding
2021-03-26 15:29 ` [PATCH 0/9] arm64: tegra: Prevent early SMMU faults Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 16:35 ` Thierry Reding
2021-03-26 16:55 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-03-26 22:05 ` Dmitry Osipenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f2039a0-bf7e-9261-62f6-bea118c64b38@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox