From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, wei.huang2@amd.com,
jsnitsel@redhat.com, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/amd: Introduce per-device domain ID to workaround potential TLB aliasing issue
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:38:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fa63c4c-28bb-246d-300b-852db447a3c7@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116140049.GD50608@ziepe.ca>
Joson,
On 1/16/2024 7:30 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 04:22:16PM +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
>
>>> The *device* has a list of PASID's that point to iommu_domains. This
>>> is stored in an xarray inside the iommu_group.
>>>
>>> The *iommu_domain* has a list of *devices & PASIDs* that can use this
>>> domain for translation (ie that it was attached to)
>>
>> IIUC domain will be having device/PASID combination something like below:
>>
>> UNMANAGED_DOMAIN_A with IO Page table :
>> - DevA + PASID zero (say non PASID capable device)
>> - devB + PASID <M>
>> - devC + PASID <N>
>>
>> We will *not* have same device with different PASID in same domain like
>> - DevB + PASID M
>> - DevB + PASID N
>>
>> Is that correct?
>
> No, all combinations are allowed in the API.
What is the use case for same device with two or more different PASID to point
to same page table?
-Vasant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 8:52 [PATCH v4 00/16] iommu/amd: SVA Support (part 3) - refactor support for GCR3 table Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu/amd: Pass struct iommu_dev_data to set_dte_entry() Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] iommu/amd: Enable Guest Translation before registering devices Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 18:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/amd: Introduce get_amd_iommu_from_dev() Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 18:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-10 12:07 ` Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/amd: Introduce struct protection_domain.pd_mode Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu/amd: Introduce per-device GCR3 table Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu/amd: Use protection_domain.flags to check page table mode Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 18:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/amd: Introduce per-device domain ID to workaround potential TLB aliasing issue Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 18:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-11 11:18 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-01-11 13:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-12 12:45 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-01-12 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 10:52 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-01-16 14:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 17:08 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2024-01-16 17:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommu/amd: Add support for device based TLB invalidation Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 19:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/amd: Rearrange GCR3 table setup code Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 19:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/amd: Refactor helper function for setting / clearing GCR3 Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 19:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-11 11:52 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-01-11 13:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-12 9:00 ` Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/amd: Refactor attaching / detaching device functions Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 19:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-11 10:06 ` Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/amd: Refactor protection_domain helper functions Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/amd: Refactor GCR3 table " Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 19:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-11 5:39 ` Vasant Hegde
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/amd: Remove unused flush pasid functions Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 19:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/amd: Rearrange device flush code Vasant Hegde
2024-01-05 19:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu/amd: Remove unused GCR3 table parameters from struct protection_domain Vasant Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fa63c4c-28bb-246d-300b-852db447a3c7@amd.com \
--to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox