* Seeing conflict with IPMMU driver under ACPI
@ 2017-09-19 0:43 Jasty, Ananth
2017-09-19 6:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jasty, Ananth @ 2017-09-19 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: magnus.damm@gmail.com
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
dann frazier, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
geert+renesas@glider.be, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Hi, with your IPMMU driver enabled under 4.13 we’re seeing a crash on boot:
[ 13.785164] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000018
[ 13.793254] [0000000000000018] user address but active_mm is swapper
[ 13.799600] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
[ 13.804466] Modules linked in: aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk crypto_simd cryptd
[ 13.811334] CPU: 152 PID: 1529 Comm: kworker/152:1 Not tainted 4.13.0-9-generic #10-Ubuntu
[ 13.819584] Hardware name: Default string Cavium ThunderX2/Default string, BIOS 5.13 07/20/2017
[ 13.828285] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
[ 13.833410] task: ffff80bee93d0000 task.stack: ffff80bee93dc000
[ 13.839330] PC is at iommu_ops_from_fwnode+0x4c/0x90
[ 13.844282] LR is at iommu_ops_from_fwnode+0x28/0x90
The ARM SMMUv3 driver (which our platform implements) seems to be losing iommu_ops to the IPMMU driver.
Note: our platform uses ACPI for device enumeration.
I have no way to test this, but is there a reason the set_iommu isn’t in _probe?
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
index 2a38aa1..d4c72da 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
@@ -1066,6 +1066,9 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mmu);
+ if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
+ bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1108,9 +1111,6 @@ static int __init ipmmu_init(void)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
- bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
-
return 0;
}
If I’m wrong, my apologies.
Thank you,
Ananth Jasty
Lead Software Engineer
Cavium
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Seeing conflict with IPMMU driver under ACPI
2017-09-19 0:43 Seeing conflict with IPMMU driver under ACPI Jasty, Ananth
@ 2017-09-19 6:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-09-19 6:54 ` Jasty, Ananth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2017-09-19 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jasty, Ananth
Cc: magnus.damm@gmail.com, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, dann frazier,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
geert+renesas@glider.be, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Hi Ananth,
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 03:43:05 EEST Jasty, Ananth wrote:
> Hi, with your IPMMU driver enabled under 4.13 we’re seeing a crash on boot:
>
> [ 13.785164] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> address 00000018
> [ 13.793254] [0000000000000018] user address but active_mm is swapper
> [ 13.799600] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
> [ 13.804466] Modules linked in: aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk crypto_simd cryptd
> [ 13.811334] CPU: 152 PID: 1529 Comm: kworker/152:1 Not tainted
> 4.13.0-9-generic #10-Ubuntu
> [ 13.819584] Hardware name: Default string Cavium ThunderX2/Default string,
> BIOS 5.13 07/20/2017
> [ 13.828285] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
> [ 13.833410] task: ffff80bee93d0000 task.stack: ffff80bee93dc000
> [ 13.839330] PC is at iommu_ops_from_fwnode+0x4c/0x90
> [ 13.844282] LR is at iommu_ops_from_fwnode+0x28/0x90
>
> The ARM SMMUv3 driver (which our platform implements) seems to be losing
> iommu_ops to the IPMMU driver.
You seem not to be the first one to notice:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9956449/
> Note: our platform uses ACPI for device enumeration.
>
> I have no way to test this, but is there a reason the set_iommu isn’t in
> _probe?
I can't recall what the reason was I'm afraid.
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> index 2a38aa1..d4c72da 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> @@ -1066,6 +1066,9 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mmu);
>
> + if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
> + bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1108,9 +1111,6 @@ static int __init ipmmu_init(void)
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
> - bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> If I’m wrong, my apologies.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Seeing conflict with IPMMU driver under ACPI
2017-09-19 6:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2017-09-19 6:54 ` Jasty, Ananth
2017-09-19 7:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jasty, Ananth @ 2017-09-19 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laurent Pinchart
Cc: laurent.pinchart+renesas-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org,
geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
dann frazier, magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
Jasty, Ananth
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2394 bytes --]
On Sep 18, 2017, at 11:49 PM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com<mailto:laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>> wrote:
Hi Ananth,
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 03:43:05 EEST Jasty, Ananth wrote:
Hi, with your IPMMU driver enabled under 4.13 we’re seeing a crash on boot:
[ 13.785164] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 00000018
[ 13.793254] [0000000000000018] user address but active_mm is swapper
[ 13.799600] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
[ 13.804466] Modules linked in: aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk crypto_simd cryptd
[ 13.811334] CPU: 152 PID: 1529 Comm: kworker/152:1 Not tainted
4.13.0-9-generic #10-Ubuntu
[ 13.819584] Hardware name: Default string Cavium ThunderX2/Default string,
BIOS 5.13 07/20/2017
[ 13.828285] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
[ 13.833410] task: ffff80bee93d0000 task.stack: ffff80bee93dc000
[ 13.839330] PC is at iommu_ops_from_fwnode+0x4c/0x90
[ 13.844282] LR is at iommu_ops_from_fwnode+0x28/0x90
The ARM SMMUv3 driver (which our platform implements) seems to be losing
iommu_ops to the IPMMU driver.
You seem not to be the first one to notice:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9956449/
Wow, he did not beat me by much.
Note: our platform uses ACPI for device enumeration.
I have no way to test this, but is there a reason the set_iommu isn’t in
_probe?
I can't recall what the reason was I'm afraid.
arm-smmu-v3.c does do the set_iommu in probe, and thus far there have been no confirmed fatalities, but I can't speak authoritatively.
I'll leave you all to it then.
Thanks,
Ananth
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
index 2a38aa1..d4c72da 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
@@ -1066,6 +1066,9 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mmu);
+ if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
+ bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1108,9 +1111,6 @@ static int __init ipmmu_init(void)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
- bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
-
return 0;
}
If I’m wrong, my apologies.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4766 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Seeing conflict with IPMMU driver under ACPI
2017-09-19 6:54 ` Jasty, Ananth
@ 2017-09-19 7:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2017-09-19 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jasty, Ananth
Cc: magnus.damm@gmail.com, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, dann frazier,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
geert+renesas@glider.be, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Hi Ananth,
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 09:54:49 EEST Jasty, Ananth wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 11:49 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 03:43:05 EEST Jasty, Ananth wrote:
> >> Hi, with your IPMMU driver enabled under 4.13 we’re seeing a crash on
> >> boot:
> >>
> >> [ 13.785164] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> >> address 00000018
> >> [ 13.793254] [0000000000000018] user address but active_mm is swapper
> >> [ 13.799600] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
> >> [ 13.804466] Modules linked in: aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk crypto_simd
> >> cryptd
> >> [ 13.811334] CPU: 152 PID: 1529 Comm: kworker/152:1 Not tainted
> >> 4.13.0-9-generic #10-Ubuntu
> >> [ 13.819584] Hardware name: Default string Cavium ThunderX2/Default
> >> string, BIOS 5.13 07/20/2017
> >> [ 13.828285] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
> >> [ 13.833410] task: ffff80bee93d0000 task.stack: ffff80bee93dc000
> >> [ 13.839330] PC is at iommu_ops_from_fwnode+0x4c/0x90
> >> [ 13.844282] LR is at iommu_ops_from_fwnode+0x28/0x90
> >>
> >> The ARM SMMUv3 driver (which our platform implements) seems to be losing
> >> iommu_ops to the IPMMU driver.
> >
> > You seem not to be the first one to notice:
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9956449/\0
>
> Wow, he did not beat me by much.
>
> >> Note: our platform uses ACPI for device enumeration.
> >>
> >> I have no way to test this, but is there a reason the set_iommu isn’t in
> >> _probe?
> >
> > I can't recall what the reason was I'm afraid.
>
> arm-smmu-v3.c does do the set_iommu in probe, and thus far there have been
> no confirmed fatalities, but I can't speak authoritatively.
>
> I'll leave you all to it then.
After digging a bit I realized that calling bus_set_iommu() from the init
function is needed to support ARM32 (the same driver supports both ARM32 and
ARM64). Let's discuss the matter in a reply to https://patchwork.kernel.org/
patch/9956449/\0.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-19 7:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-19 0:43 Seeing conflict with IPMMU driver under ACPI Jasty, Ananth
2017-09-19 6:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-09-19 6:54 ` Jasty, Ananth
2017-09-19 7:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).