From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAEB0C43334 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766758196E; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 766758196E X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zR2-pwSJad9d; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94FD181926; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 94FD181926 Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB09C0032; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F48BC002D for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520EE408F7 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 520EE408F7 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9_HM10Tjo8GY for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 6BB1A408EE Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BB1A408EE for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LXMnz3Xjcz686M3; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:29:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) by fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:34:00 +0200 Received: from [10.126.174.22] (10.126.174.22) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:33:59 +0100 Message-ID: <38ae1cc8-1411-bb54-e082-0f7b91cb9e63@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:33:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors To: Damien Le Moal , References: <1656343521-62897-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1656343521-62897-6-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <6619638c-52e8-cb67-c56c-9c9d38c18161@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.126.174.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml726-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.77) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, will@kernel.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: John Garry via iommu Reply-To: John Garry Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On 28/06/2022 10:14, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> BTW, this patch has no real dependency on the rest of the series, so >> could be taken separately if you prefer. > Sure, you can send it separately. Adding it through the scsi tree is fine too. > Well Christoph originally offered to take this series via the dma-mapping tree. @Christoph, is that still ok with you? If so, would you rather I send this libata patch separately? Thanks, john _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43733257A for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LXMnz3Xjcz686M3; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:29:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) by fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:34:00 +0200 Received: from [10.126.174.22] (10.126.174.22) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:33:59 +0100 Message-ID: <38ae1cc8-1411-bb54-e082-0f7b91cb9e63@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:33:58 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors To: Damien Le Moal , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <1656343521-62897-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1656343521-62897-6-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <6619638c-52e8-cb67-c56c-9c9d38c18161@huawei.com> From: John Garry In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.126.174.22] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml726-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.77) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Message-ID: <20220628113358.SnSfPeddmasQ79gfFhtNnrDLnsjRo4QhUjjdAQA4U7o@z> On 28/06/2022 10:14, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> BTW, this patch has no real dependency on the rest of the series, so >> could be taken separately if you prefer. > Sure, you can send it separately. Adding it through the scsi tree is fine too. > Well Christoph originally offered to take this series via the dma-mapping tree. @Christoph, is that still ok with you? If so, would you rather I send this libata patch separately? Thanks, john