From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Kuehling, Felix" <felix.kuehling@amd.com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
Amandeep Kaur Longia <AmandeepKaur.Longia@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/amd: Force identity mode for selected GPUs only
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 20:07:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39ce2a2f-3bb8-43e7-9446-a67551cce104@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805010706.GC28508@ziepe.ca>
Jason,
On 8/5/2026 6:37 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 04:56:37PM +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
>
>> Based on discussion so far in this thread and the link Mario shared earlier [1]:
>> - We still need identity mapping for APUs. I will fine tune the patch based on
>> the discussion in this thread.
>
> IMHO if certain HW has broken support for PAGING (eg because it can't
> handle the isochronous needs) then it should be quirked and blocked
> properly.
>
> I thought the issue here was the PASID check forcing identity and
> accidently capturing these raven chips too? It should just be moved
> out to a normal quirk..
>
>> - Its fine to drop SNP check
>> - I am still not sure its safe to drop SME check (CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT)
>> Because here were are putting all APUs in identity mode.
>> Commit ea68573d408f explicitly error out for RAVEN and some of the older APU
>> platform didn't support SME. But not sure about newer ones.
>
> That's quite a hacky check to make in that commit..
>
>> So I am inclined to keep SME check for now. Once this patch stabilized we can
>> revisit the SME check?
>
> The SME check makes no sense either, but if you want to stage things
> I'm OK with it.
Right. Eventually it should remove SME as well. But I am concerned about any
regression. Also I don't have all these devices to test it. Hence for now I will
limit to APUs, keep SME check and drop SNP check. Once it settle, we can go with
next step.
I will respin the patch later this week.
-Vasant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 6:15 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/amd: Fix default domain selection for PASID-capable devices Vasant Hegde
2026-07-23 6:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Mark Radeon Pro WX 4100 ATS as broken Vasant Hegde
2026-07-23 15:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 15:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-23 16:51 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-07-23 6:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/amd: Force identity mode for selected GPUs only Vasant Hegde
2026-07-23 15:53 ` Ankit Soni
2026-07-23 16:29 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-07-23 15:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 16:11 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-23 16:23 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-07-23 16:32 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-23 16:55 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-07-23 19:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-23 19:58 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-23 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-07-24 15:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 4:13 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-07-23 16:33 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-07-24 15:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 4:19 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-07-27 14:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-28 4:52 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-07-28 5:31 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-28 19:10 ` Kuehling, Felix
2026-07-28 19:57 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-30 11:26 ` Vasant Hegde
2026-08-05 1:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-05 14:37 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2026-08-05 17:22 ` Deucher, Alexander
2026-08-05 17:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-08-05 18:12 ` Deucher, Alexander
2026-08-05 19:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-31 20:23 ` Deucher, Alexander
2026-07-31 20:19 ` Deucher, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39ce2a2f-3bb8-43e7-9446-a67551cce104@amd.com \
--to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=AmandeepKaur.Longia@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox