From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, jgg@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] iommu: Decouple iommu_present() from bus ops
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:05:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43ca2a88-942e-4d65-87f1-30a7cf537edd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6711338e24dd1edfd02187f25cf40d8622cefdb2.1697047261.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
On 10/12/23 2:14 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Much as I'd like to remove iommu_present(), the final remaining users
> are proving stubbornly difficult to clean up, so kick that can down the
> road and just rework it to preserve the current behaviour without
> depending on bus ops. Since commit 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup
The iommu_present() is only used in below two drivers.
$ git grep iommu_present
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c: if
(!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c: if (host1x_drm_wants_iommu(dev) &&
iommu_present(&platform_bus_type)) {
Both are platform drivers and have the device pointer passed in. Just
out of curiosity, why not replacing them with device_iommu_mapped()
instead? Sorry if I overlooked previous discussion.
Best regards,
baolu
> to IOMMU device registration"), any registered IOMMU instance is already
> considered "present" for every entry in iommu_buses, so it's simply a
> case of validating the bus and checking we have at least once IOMMU.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>
> ---
>
> v3: Tweak to use the ops-based check rather than group-based, to
> properly match the existing behaviour
> v4: Just look for IOMMU instances instead of managed devices
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 5a3ce293a5de..7bb92e8b7a49 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -2000,9 +2000,28 @@ int bus_iommu_probe(const struct bus_type *bus)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * iommu_present() - make platform-specific assumptions about an IOMMU
> + * @bus: bus to check
> + *
> + * Do not use this function. You want device_iommu_mapped() instead.
> + *
> + * Return: true if some IOMMU is present and aware of devices on the given bus;
> + * in general it may not be the only IOMMU, and it may not have anything to do
> + * with whatever device you are ultimately interested in.
> + */
> bool iommu_present(const struct bus_type *bus)
> {
> - return bus->iommu_ops != NULL;
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iommu_buses); i++) {
> + if (iommu_buses[i] == bus) {
> + spin_lock(&iommu_device_lock);
> + ret = !list_empty(&iommu_device_list);
> + spin_unlock(&iommu_device_lock);
> + }
> + }
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_present);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 18:14 [PATCH v5 0/7] iommu: Retire bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] iommu: Factor out some helpers Robin Murphy
2023-10-11 23:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 23:04 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] iommu: Decouple iommu_present() from bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-10-12 6:05 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2023-10-12 11:40 ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-12 12:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 12:57 ` Baolu Lu
2023-10-12 12:58 ` Baolu Lu
2023-10-18 23:05 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] iommu: Validate that devices match domains Robin Murphy
2023-10-18 23:14 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-24 18:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-25 12:39 ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-25 12:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-25 16:05 ` Robin Murphy
2023-10-25 16:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] iommu: Decouple iommu_domain_alloc() from bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-10-11 23:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 23:15 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Don't register fwnode for legacy binding Robin Murphy
2023-10-12 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-18 23:29 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] iommu: Retire bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-10-18 23:36 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2023-10-11 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] iommu: Clean up open-coded ownership checks Robin Murphy
2023-10-12 12:57 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-18 23:40 ` Jerry Snitselaar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43ca2a88-942e-4d65-87f1-30a7cf537edd@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox