From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Require CMPXCHG16B for PASID support
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:59:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43d53037-c8cb-43ce-b99d-93ad59fac72f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309134208.GF3717316@nvidia.com>
On 3/9/26 21:42, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 02:06:43PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The Intel IOMMU driver is moving toward using the generic entry_sync
>> library for PASID table entry updates. This library requires 128-bit
>> atomic write operations (cmpxchg128) to update 512-bit PASID entries in
>> atomic quanta, ensuring the hardware never observes a torn entry.
>>
>> On x86_64, 128-bit atomicity is provided by the CMPXCHG16B instruction.
>> Update the driver to:
>>
>> 1. Limit INTEL_IOMMU to X86_64, as 128-bit atomic operations are not
>> available on 32-bit x86.
>> 2. Gate pasid_supported() on the presence of X86_FEATURE_CX16.
>> 3. Provide a boot-time warning if a PASID-capable IOMMU is detected on
>> a CPU lacking the required instruction.
> This is fine, but it also occured to me that we could change the
> writer somewhat to just detect what the update granual is and fall
> back to 64 bit in this case. So everything still works, it just does
> non-present alot more often.
That's a good point. Though I don't expect many real-world use cases for
PASID on platforms lacking CX16, making the entry_sync library and the
driver adaptive would make the infrastructure more robust. I will look
into supporting a 64-bit fallback.
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 6:06 [PATCH 0/8] iommu/vt-d: Hitless PASID updates via entry_sync Lu Baolu
2026-03-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Lift and generalize the STE/CD update code from SMMUv3 Lu Baolu
2026-03-09 23:33 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-10 0:06 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-14 8:13 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-16 9:51 ` Will Deacon
2026-03-18 3:10 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-23 12:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-24 5:30 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-16 16:35 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-18 3:23 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-30 13:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-30 15:30 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-13 5:39 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-03-16 6:24 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-23 12:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-24 5:49 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 2/8] iommu/vt-d: Add entry_sync support for PASID entry updates Lu Baolu
2026-03-09 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-11 8:42 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-11 12:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-12 7:51 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-12 7:50 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-12 11:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-15 8:11 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-23 13:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-24 6:22 ` Baolu Lu
2026-03-24 12:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Require CMPXCHG16B for PASID support Lu Baolu
2026-03-09 13:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-03-12 7:59 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-03-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Add trace events for PASID entry sync updates Lu Baolu
2026-03-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/vt-d: Use intel_pasid_write() for first-stage setup Lu Baolu
2026-03-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu/vt-d: Use intel_pasid_write() for second-stage setup Lu Baolu
2026-03-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu/vt-d: Use intel_pasid_write() for pass-through setup Lu Baolu
2026-03-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/vt-d: Use intel_pasid_write() for nested setup Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43d53037-c8cb-43ce-b99d-93ad59fac72f@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmaluka@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox