From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: laurent.pinchart+renesas-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org,
geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
horms+renesas-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Add new IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA ops
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:13:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4788186.AG5JRIdpl8@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161110114206.GC9996-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Hello,
On Thursday 10 Nov 2016 12:42:06 Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 06:52:53PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > -static struct iommu_domain *ipmmu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
> > > -{
> > > - if (type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> > > - return NULL;
> >
> > I *think* that if we did the initial check thus:
> > if (type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED ||
> >
> > (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA) && type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA))
> >
> > return NULL;
> >
> > it shouldn't be necessary to split the function at all - we then just
> > wrap the {get,put}_cookie() bits in "if (type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA)" and
> > in the 32-bit ARM case they just don't run as that can never be true.
>
> This would be a good improvement. Magnus, Robin, can either of you send
> a follow-on patch to implement this suggestion? I have applied these
> patches to my arm/renesas branch (not pushed yet). The patch can be
> based on it.
I like the suggestion too, a patch is on its way.
Joerg, as I've sent a few comments about the other patches (sorry for the late
review, I got delayed by KS and LPC), the follow-up patch should probably be
squashed into this one when Magnus addresses my comments. Could you please
hold off pushing the arm/renesas branch until Magnus replies to this ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-11 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-19 23:35 [PATCH v6 00/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: IPMMU multi-arch update V6 Magnus Damm
2016-10-19 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 01/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Remove platform data handling Magnus Damm
2016-10-19 23:35 ` [PATCH v6 02/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Rework interrupt code and use bitmap for context Magnus Damm
2016-11-11 0:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-19 23:36 ` [PATCH v6 03/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Break out utlb parsing code Magnus Damm
2016-11-11 1:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-19 23:36 ` [PATCH v6 04/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Break out domain allocation code Magnus Damm
2016-11-11 1:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-19 23:36 ` [PATCH v6 05/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Add new IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA ops Magnus Damm
2016-10-21 17:52 ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-10 11:42 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20161110114206.GC9996-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-11 1:13 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-11-11 10:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-11-11 1:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-11 14:44 ` Robin Murphy
[not found] ` <dbb87293-4760-607f-841c-368a5692ecc9-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-12 1:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-11 1:24 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-11 2:01 ` [PATCH] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Unify domain alloc/free implementations Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-19 23:36 ` [PATCH v6 06/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: ARM and ARM64 archdata access Magnus Damm
2016-10-21 17:32 ` Robin Murphy
2016-11-11 1:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-19 23:36 ` [PATCH v6 07/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Drop LPAE Kconfig dependency Magnus Damm
2016-11-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v6 00/07] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: IPMMU multi-arch update V6 Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4788186.AG5JRIdpl8@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart-rylnwiuwjnjg/c1bvhzhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=horms+renesas-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).