From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takao Indoh Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] intel-iommu: Disable DMA Remapping when intel_iommu=off Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:06:45 +0900 Message-ID: <5174E185.1040806@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1366441080-5937-1-git-send-email-wei@aristanetworks.com> <5174CB26.9060908@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: wei-BGArkANP9klv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org (2013/04/22 15:50), Wei Hu wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Takao Indoh > wrote: >> (2013/04/20 15:58), Wei Hu wrote: >>> On a VT-d capable machine Linux will enable IOMMU by default. If it >>> then kexec's a second kernel with intel_iommu=off, this second kernel >>> will leave the DMA remapping engine on with no code handling it. The >>> symptom is at least USB and SATA drives stop working. This patch fixes >>> the problem by always disabling DMA remapping when intel_iommu=off. >> >> Even when second kernel boots up with intel_iommu=on, dma-remapping need >> to be disabled as well before it is initialized and enabled again in >> init_dmars(). So, how about something like this? >> >> for_each_drhd_unit(drhd) { >> struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd; >> if (drhd->ignored) >> continue; >> >> iommu = drhd->iommu; >> if (iommu->gcmd & DMA_GCMD_TE) >> iommu_disable_translation(iommu); >> } >> >> Note, if you agree above code and fix your patch like this, you need >> additinal fix to set iommu->gcmd flag sinse gcmd is always zero here. >> See first hunk of this patch. >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/20/707 > > Thanks for your reply. I reviewed your patch. Are you suggesting > keeping your change to dmar.c, and moving your change to intel-iommu.c > (i.e. the code you just showed) up after the call to > dmar_table_init()? > Yes, exactly. Thanks, Takao Indoh