Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Kroening <gfk@sgi.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>,
	jroedel@suse.de
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] iommu/vt-d: Use the SIRTP when enabling remapping
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 02:58:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <541004B6.8070800@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540FF614.8000003@siemens.com>

On 9/10/2014 1:56 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2014-09-09 23:11, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
>> The previous change (iommu/vt-d: Don't store SIRTP request) to this area
>> caused a crash in our simulator. In particular is seems that by the time a
>> UART interrupt is sent through the system, we don't see interrupt remapping
>> to be enabled.  So the interrupt does not get translated to a logical
>> interrupt and crashes.
>>
>> OR'ing the SIRTP request to make sure it is seen but hopefully not sticky.
>> This seems like a clean fix, at least on our simulator; if you don't agree,
>> our simulator guy will take a closer look at our iommu model.
>
> Check the VT-d spec (6.7, Set Interrupt Remapping Table Pointer
> Operation): "Software must always follow the interrupt-remapping table
> pointer set operation with a global invalidate of the IEC to ensure
> hardware references the new structures *before* enabling interrupt
> remapping." There is also (command register description): "If multiple
> control fields in this register need to be modified, software must
> serialize the modifications through multiple writes to this register."
> This, in combination with the command registers description of bits 24
> and 25 strongly suggests that your model is broken.

Thanks, Jan. I'll read up on it. Still working out some kinks with
the relatively new IOMMU/interrupt-remapping logic which we added over
the last 18 months or so. Sorry for any distraction, and thanks for the
help/info.
Gary

>
>>
>> Found testing on our simulator, not real hardware.
>
> Funnily, the original issue was found by the QEMU model of VT-d that
> used to take the last cited sentence very strictly (I asked to remove it
> due to the preexisting Linux versions).
>
> Jan
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-10  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-09 21:11 [RFC] iommu/vt-d: Use the SIRTP when enabling remapping Nathan Zimmer
     [not found] ` <1410297096-54096-1-git-send-email-nzimmer-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-10  6:56   ` Jan Kiszka
2014-09-10  7:58     ` Gary Kroening [this message]
     [not found]       ` <541004B6.8070800-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-10 20:50         ` Gary Kroening

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=541004B6.8070800@sgi.com \
    --to=gfk@sgi.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox