From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Murphy Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dma-mapping: tidy up dma_parms default handling Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:07:24 +0000 Message-ID: <54B3C70C.4070009@arm.com> References: <2031542.TLqIP3YVGc@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2031542.TLqIP3YVGc@wuerfel> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org" , "bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On 09/01/15 19:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 09 January 2015 16:56:03 Robin Murphy wrote: >> >> This one's a bit tricky to find a home for - I think technically it's >> probably an IOMMU patch, but then the long-underlying problem doesn't >> seem to have blown up anything until arm64, and my motivation is to >> make bits of Juno work, which seems to nudge it towards arm64/arm-soc >> territory. Could anyone suggest which tree is most appropriate? > > I have a set of patches touching various dma-mapping.h related bits > across architectures and in ARM in particular. Your patch fits into > that series, and I guess we could either have it in my asm-generic > tree or in Andrew Morton's mm tree. Possibly also arm-soc for practical > reasons, although it really doesn't belong in there. > Thanks Arnd, I'd agree asm-generic or mm sound the most sensible - If you're happy to carry this patch with your series that'd be really helpful. Robin.