From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Emil Medve Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/26] iommu/fsl: Sprinkle some __init* annotations Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:23:41 -0600 Message-ID: <54CB93ED.80109@Freescale.com> References: <1422455698-3074-1-git-send-email-Emilian.Medve@Freescale.com> <1422455698-3074-2-git-send-email-Emilian.Medve@Freescale.com> <54CB2AEC.9000800@Freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Sethi Varun-B16395 , "iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org" , "joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "jroedel-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org" List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Hello Varun, On 01/30/2015 03:20 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > Hi Emil, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Emil Medve [mailto:Emilian.Medve-eDlz3WWmN0ll57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org] >> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 12:26 PM >> To: Sethi Varun-B16395; iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org; >> joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org; jroedel-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/26] iommu/fsl: Sprinkle some __init* annotations >> >> Hello Varun, >> >> >> On 01/30/2015 12:46 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: >>> Hi Emil, >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Emil Medve [mailto:Emilian.Medve-eDlz3WWmN0ll57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 8:05 PM >>>> To: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org; joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org; >>>> jroedel-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org; Sethi Varun-B16395 >>>> Cc: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 >>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 01/26] iommu/fsl: Sprinkle some __init* >>>> annotations >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Emil Medve >>>> --- >>>> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c | 12 ++++++------ >>>> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c | 2 +- >>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >>>> index d958e65..652c34d 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c >>>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct pamu_isr_data { >>>> >>>> static struct paace *ppaact; >>>> static struct paace *spaact; >>>> -static struct ome *omt; >>>> +static struct ome *omt __initdata; >>> >>> [varun] omt shouldn't be initdata. >> >> It seems to be used only from probe()'s call tree: fsl_pamu_probe() and >> setup_omt(); both __init functions. Am I missing something? >> >> > Omt corresponds to PAMU operation mapping table, which is pointed to > by the PAMU OMT base registers. We are using operation mapping table for > operation translation. Yes, but this 'omt' is just a pointer (should it be annotated as __iomem?) to the table and not used past the call sequence fsl_pamu_probe()->setup_omt(). For that matter 'omt' can be local to fsl_pamu_probe(). The hardware table/storage is used by the PAMU past the setup, but this pointer is not Cheers,