From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Li, ZhenHua" Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/10] iommu/vt-d: Add functions to load and save old re Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:47:07 +0800 Message-ID: <5552AD1B.6030208@hp.com> References: <1431337974-545-1-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com> <1431337974-545-6-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com> <20150512083745.GE4561@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150512083745.GE4561-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Dave Young Cc: bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, tom.vaden-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, rwright-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lisa.mitchell-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, "Li, ZhenHua" , doug.hatch-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, ishii.hironobu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, billsumnerlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, li.zhang6-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On 05/12/2015 04:37 PM, Dave Young wrote: > Seems the subject was truncated? Maybe "re" means root entry? Then please fix it > > On 05/11/15 at 05:52pm, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote: >> Add functions to load root entry table from old kernel, and to save updated >> root entry table. >> Add two member in struct intel_iommu, to store the RTA in old kernel, and >> the mapped virt address of it. > > Please explain a bit what is "RTA" in patch log, it is unclear to most of people > who do not know iommu details. > >> If people want to understand this patchset, I assume they have read the vt-d specs. RTA is defined clearly in this spec.