From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Auger Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] vfio: platform: return device properties as arrays of unsigned integers Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:49:29 +0200 Message-ID: <55E87A19.6010009@linaro.org> References: <1419024032-1269-1-git-send-email-a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com> <1419024032-1269-4-git-send-email-a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1419024032-1269-4-git-send-email-a.motakis-lrHrjnjw1UfHK3s98zE1ajGjJy/sRE9J@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Baptiste Reynal , kvmarm-FPEHb7Xf0XXUo1n7N8X6UoWGPAHP3yOg@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: tech-lrHrjnjw1UfHK3s98zE1ajGjJy/sRE9J@public.gmane.org, VFIO DRIVER , christoffer.dall-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, open list List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On 12/19/2014 10:20 PM, Antonios Motakis wrote: > Certain properties of a device are accessible as an array of unsigned > integers, either u64, u32, u16, or u8. Let the VFIO user query this > type of device properties. > > Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis > --- > drivers/vfio/platform/properties.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/properties.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/properties.c > index 39c6342..645f6e5c 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/properties.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/properties.c > @@ -55,7 +55,67 @@ static int dev_property_get_uint(struct device *dev, char *name, > uint32_t type, unsigned *lenp, > void __user *datap, unsigned long datasz) > { > - return -EINVAL; > + int ret, n; > + u8 *out; > + size_t sz; > + int (*func)(const struct device *, const char *, void *, size_t) > + = NULL; > + > + switch (type) { > + case VFIO_DEV_PROPERTY_TYPE_U64: > + sz = sizeof(u64); > + func = (int (*)(const struct device *, > + const char *, void *, size_t)) > + device_property_read_u64_array; > + break; > + case VFIO_DEV_PROPERTY_TYPE_U32: > + sz = sizeof(u32); > + func = (int (*)(const struct device *, > + const char *, void *, size_t)) > + device_property_read_u32_array; > + break; > + case VFIO_DEV_PROPERTY_TYPE_U16: > + sz = sizeof(u16); > + func = (int (*)(const struct device *, > + const char *, void *, size_t)) > + device_property_read_u16_array; > + break; > + case VFIO_DEV_PROPERTY_TYPE_U8: > + sz = sizeof(u8); > + func = (int (*)(const struct device *, > + const char *, void *, size_t)) > + device_property_read_u8_array; > + break; > + > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* get size of array */ > + n = func(dev, name, NULL, 0); > + if (n < 0) > + return n; > + > + if (lenp) > + *lenp = n * sz; is it really relevant to check lenp is allocated? also what if it is not... > + > + if (n * sz > datasz) > + return -EOVERFLOW; so you could have done that too for strings. Isn't it simpler? Note the *lengp value is not consistent with what was done for strings. > + > + out = kcalloc(n, sz, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!out) > + return -EFAULT; -ENOMEM? > + > + ret = func(dev, name, out, n); > + if (ret) > + goto out; > + > + if (copy_to_user(datap, out, n * sz)) > + ret = -EFAULT; > + > +out: > + kfree(out); > + return ret; > } > > int vfio_platform_dev_properties(struct device *dev, >