From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 002BCC433F5 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F67C40463; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b_a3Xm1lfa_i; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4852640469; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173EBC001A; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926FDC000B for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F0640469 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MF7GOkpcq5jn for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F00400F1 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:27:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1644798471; x=1676334471; h=message-id:date:mime-version:cc:subject:to:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kcElbae+RGFK/QaqPxibrAKD4Hv4dczBgQ4u6tcccQU=; b=RQ6x2cKzJBNzC2W01mJQ5PY4tRYncrG00Io7agkcU5gEvj/+KhzwMfOF hoBzk5zKWOagYlmhxtTpG+kAvPz2+FEUdfD2iIF9RIxFFaKXpx5A/VAx/ mBGf3e3lFKjJVzUJI5Dlf08a/oB+BXfCLPQkdW8IMxeHIYuXcBatqBT4p ecvhXD7YV0KilSsc7mUdmzPY9dlDQDDJLXDTYnB461OewA75Je0rSg+Gy 7NYZB4U5dsPz69Dad+XvG0ZMtqttLJkH4N+ifjmrCwT8btR+mpYE7XtLK FrIobjmu2dN0QDWHGxPCxuOfBpIbBXI8eJOjF3/7SNOvRXoJyANSE56mo w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10257"; a="336411067" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,366,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="336411067" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2022 16:27:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,366,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="680101107" Received: from allen-box.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.118]) ([10.239.159.118]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2022 16:27:48 -0800 Message-ID: <574b5298-005e-a083-284b-9b6b52c600f5@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:26:31 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] iommu/vt-d: Some Intel IOMMU cleanups Content-Language: en-US To: Jason Gunthorpe References: <20220207064142.1092846-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20220211130144.GM4160@nvidia.com> From: Lu Baolu In-Reply-To: <20220211130144.GM4160@nvidia.com> Cc: Kevin Tian , Ashok Raj , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" Hi Jason, On 2/11/22 9:01 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 02:41:32PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> After a long time of evolution, the drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c becomes >> fat and a bit messy. This series tries to cleanup and refactor the >> driver to make it more concise. Your comments are very appreciated. > > I wanted to take a closer look at what you are trying to do with rcu, > but these patches don't apply. Please always sent patches against a > well known tree like v5.17-rc or the iommu tree, or something. > > Anyhow, I think you should split the last 4 patches out of this series > and send them seperately. Sure! I will resend this series soon. Best regards, baolu _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu