From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xunlei Pang Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Flush old iotlb for kdump when the device gets context mapped Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:44:00 +0800 Message-ID: <58400D00.6070708@redhat.com> References: <582C232F.6080205@redhat.com> <582D1A40.409@redhat.com> <20161129143547.GG2078@8bytes.org> <583E8A9B.7070906@redhat.com> <20161130090327.GA4192@x1> <20161130095334.GB4192@x1> <20161130102334.GC4192@x1> <20161130142642.GJ2078@8bytes.org> <583F87D1.6030402@redhat.com> <20161201103307.GL2078@8bytes.org> Reply-To: xlpang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161201103307.GL2078-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Joerg Roedel , xlpang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: Don Brace , Dave Young , kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, LKML , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Myron Stowe , David Woodhouse List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On 12/01/2016 at 06:33 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:15:45AM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote: >> index 3965e73..624eac9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c >> @@ -2024,6 +2024,25 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain, >> if (context_present(context)) >> goto out_unlock; >> >> + /* >> + * For kdump cases, old valid entries may be cached due to the >> + * in-flight DMA and copied pgtable, but there is no unmapping >> + * behaviour for them, thus we need an explicit cache flush for >> + * the newly-mapped device. For kdump, at this point, the device >> + * is supposed to finish reset at its driver probe stage, so no >> + * in-flight DMA will exist, and we don't need to worry anymore >> + * hereafter. >> + */ >> + if (context_copied(context)) { >> + u16 did_old = context_domain_id(context); >> + >> + if (did_old >= 0 && did_old < cap_ndoms(iommu->cap)) >> + iommu->flush.flush_context(iommu, did_old, >> + (((u16)bus) << 8) | devfn, >> + DMA_CCMD_MASK_NOBIT, >> + DMA_CCMD_DEVICE_INVL); >> + } >> + >> pgd = domain->pgd; > Yes, this looks better. Have you tested it the same way as the old > patch? Yes, I have tested and it works, will send v3 later. Regards, Xunlei