From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@nxp.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Device obligation to write into a DMA_FROM_DEVICE streaming DMA mapping
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 18:27:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <584b54f6-bd12-d036-35e6-23eb2dabe811@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0402MB348537CB86926B3E6D1DBE0A98070@VI1PR0402MB3485.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 21/05/2019 18:14, Horia Geanta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it mandatory for a device to write data in an area DMA mapped DMA_FROM_DEVICE?
> Can't the device just "ignore" that mapping - i.e. not write anything - and
> driver should expect original data to be found in that location (since it was
> not touched / written to by the device)?
> [Let's leave cache coherency aside, and consider "original data" to be in RAM.]
>
> I am asking this since I am seeing what seems to be an inconsistent behavior /
> semantics between cases when swiotlb bouncing is used and when it's not.
>
> Specifically, the context is:
> 1. driver prepares a scatterlist with several entries and performs a
> dma_map_sg() with direction FROM_DEVICE
> 2. device decides there's no need to write into the buffer pointed by first
> scatterlist entry and skips it (writing into subsequent buffers)
> 3. driver is notified the device finished processing and dma unmaps the scatterlist
>
> When swiotlb bounce is used, the buffer pointed to by first scatterlist entry is
> corrupted. That's because swiotlb implementation expects the device to write
> something into that buffer, however the device logic is "whatever was previously
> in that buffer should be used" (2. above).
>
> For FROM_DEVICE direction:
> -swiotlb_tbl_map_single() does not copy data from original location to swiotlb
> if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))
> swiotlb_bounce(orig_addr, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> -swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() copies data from swiotlb to original location
> if (orig_addr != INVALID_PHYS_ADDR &&
> !(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) &&
> ((dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) || (dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)))
> swiotlb_bounce(orig_addr, tlb_addr, size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> and when device did not write anything (as in current situation), it overwrites
> original data with zeros
>
> In case swiotlb bounce is not used and device does not write into the
> FROM_DEVICE streaming DMA maping, the original data is available.
>
> Could you please clarify whether:
> -I am missing something obvious OR
> -the DMA API documentation should be updated - to mandate for device writes into
> FROM_DEVICE mappings) OR
> -the swiotlb implementation should be updated - to copy data from original
> location irrespective of DMA mapping direction?
Hmm, that certainly feels like a bug in SWIOTLB - it seems reasonable in
principle for a device to only partially update a mapped buffer before a
sync/unmap, so I'd say it probably should be filling the bounce buffer
with the original data at the start, regardless of direction.
Robin.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-21 17:14 Device obligation to write into a DMA_FROM_DEVICE streaming DMA mapping Horia Geanta
2019-05-21 17:27 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=584b54f6-bd12-d036-35e6-23eb2dabe811@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox