From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBF0C2D0C3 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1574720882 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1574720882 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC3085683; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tv2B_ZJq7Y4q; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC5E85650; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CBAC18DD; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9BCC0881 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E44C85404 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8H9AH2dtRIpM for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:49:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1CAA811E9 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 02:48:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Dec 2019 18:48:59 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,365,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="243382416" Received: from allen-box.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.136]) ([10.239.159.136]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2019 18:48:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Loose requirement for flush queue initializaton To: Joerg Roedel References: <20191219051851.25159-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20191219051851.25159-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: <5d798620-ef1a-7e89-96c5-ed902d90a9a2@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:47:56 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191219051851.25159-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, David Woodhouse X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On 12/19/19 1:18 PM, Lu Baolu wrote: > Currently if flush queue initialization fails, we return error > or enforce the system-wide strict mode. These are unnecessary > because we always check the existence of a flush queue before > queuing any iova's for lazy flushing. Printing a informational > message is enough. > > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu Queued for v5.6. Thanks, -baolu _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu