Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add default domain quirk for Arm Fast Models
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:07:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60c3dccb-b6a8-2f04-7994-80d51a70d49f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7hfybmb.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On 2021-06-30 09:56, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 18:34:40 +0100,
> Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 05:24:49PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> Arm Fast Models are still implementing legacy virtio-pci devices behind
>>> the SMMU, which continue to be problematic as "real hardware" devices
>>> (from the point of view of the simulated system) without the mitigating
>>> VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM feature.
>>>
>>> Since we now have the ability to force passthrough on a device-specific
>>> basis, let's use it to work around this particular oddity so that people
>>> who just want to boot Linux on a model don't have to fiddle around with
>>> things to avoid the SMMU getting in the way by default (and I don't have
>>> to keep telling them which things...)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> Any chance of getting the fastmodels updated instead? It feels like it
>> has to happen *eventually*, and then there would be no need for this bodge.
> 
> That'd be ideal. What are the chances of that happening before the Sun
> turns into a black hole?

We'll try making some noise again internally and see where that goes, 
but given the progress over the last 4 years I'd be inclined to posit a 
new theory of the universe eventually ending in one giant event 0x10.

>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> index 54b2f27b81d4..13cf16e8f45b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> @@ -2649,6 +2649,20 @@ static int arm_smmu_dev_disable_feature(struct device *dev,
>>>   	}
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +static int arm_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
>>> +		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>>> +
>>> +		/* Legacy virtio-block devices on Arm Fast Models */
>>> +		if (pdev->vendor == 0x1af4 && pdev->device == 0x1001 &&
>>> +		    pdev->subsystem_vendor == 0x00ff && pdev->subsystem_device == 0x0002)
>>> +			return IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
> 
> Could this be expressed as a PCI quirk instead? It would at least keep
> the ID matching out of the SMMU driver...

I don't think so - getting the information from the PCI layer to the 
IOMMU layer at the right place and time to influence the default domain 
choice would seemingly need some uglier and even less popular 
infrastructure adding. It's something that only the IOMMU layer has any 
need to be aware of, and the def_domain_type callback essentially exists 
for this kind of special-casing - compare intel-iommu's 
device_def_domain_type() for example. If we accept a workaround at all, 
I do believe this is the least-worst option.

Robin.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

      reply	other threads:[~2021-06-30 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18 16:24 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add default domain quirk for Arm Fast Models Robin Murphy
2021-06-24 15:57 ` Andre Przywara
2021-06-29 17:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-29 18:10   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-30  8:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-30 11:07     ` Robin Murphy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60c3dccb-b6a8-2f04-7994-80d51a70d49f@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox