From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A621C05 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ip4d1634d3.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.22.52.211] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1poK6b-0001cB-Kj; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 10:20:57 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Marc Zyngier , Olof Johansson , Chao Wang Cc: hust-os-kernel-patches@googlegroups.com, Chao Wang , Dongliang Mu , iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Fix unwind goto issue Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 10:20:56 +0200 Message-ID: <6931079.K2JlShyGXD@diego> In-Reply-To: <20230417030421.2777-1-D202280639@hust.edu.cn> References: <20230417030421.2777-1-D202280639@hust.edu.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Montag, 17. April 2023, 05:04:21 CEST schrieb Chao Wang: > Smatch complains that > drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c:1306 rk_iommu_probe() warn: missing unwind goto? > > The rk_iommu_probe function, after obtaining the irq value through > platform_get_irq, directly returns an error if the returned value > is negative, without releasing any resources. > > Fix this by adding a new error handling label "err_pm_disable" and > use a goto statement to redirect to the error handling process. In > order to preserve the original semantics, set err to the value of irq. > > Fixes: 1aa55ca9b14a ("iommu/rockchip: Move irq request past pm_runtime_enable") > Signed-off-by: Chao Wang > Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu Looking at the code, that makes a lot of sense. Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner