public inbox for iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:34:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7217a79d-fd0b-8bb8-1401-a6ab08a47f6d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB527652AF527A66551934CD4F8CDE9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On 2022/6/2 14:29, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 7:02 PM
>>
>> On 2022/6/1 17:28, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2022 2:30 PM
>>>>
>>>> When the IOMMU domain is about to be freed, it should not be set on
>> any
>>>> device. Instead of silently dealing with some bug cases, it's better to
>>>> trigger a warning to report and fix any potential bugs at the first time.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>    static void domain_exit(struct dmar_domain *domain)
>>>>    {
>>>> -
>>>> -	/* Remove associated devices and clear attached or cached domains
>>>> */
>>>> -	domain_remove_dev_info(domain);
>>>> +	if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&domain->devices)))
>>>> +		return;
>>>>
>>>
>>> warning is good but it doesn't mean the driver shouldn't deal with
>>> that situation to make it safer e.g. blocking DMA from all attached
>>> device...
>>
>> I have ever thought the same thing. :-)
>>
>> Blocking DMA from attached device should be done when setting blocking
>> domain to the device. It should not be part of freeing a domain.
> 
> yes but here we are talking about some bug scenario.
> 
>>
>> Here, the caller asks the driver to free the domain, but the driver
>> finds that something is wrong. Therefore, it warns and returns directly.
>> The domain will still be there in use until the next set_domain().
>>
> 
> at least it'd look safer if we always try to unmap the entire domain i.e.:
> 
> static void domain_exit(struct dmar_domain *domain)
> {
> -
> -	/* Remove associated devices and clear attached or cached domains */
> -	domain_remove_dev_info(domain);
> 
> 	if (domain->pgd) {
> 		LIST_HEAD(freelist);
> 
> 		domain_unmap(domain, 0, DOMAIN_MAX_PFN(domain->gaw), &freelist);
> 		put_pages_list(&freelist);
> 	}
> 
> +	if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&domain->devices)))
> +		return;
> 
> 	kfree(domain);
> }

Fair enough. Removing all mappings is safer.

Best regards,
baolu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-06  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-27  6:30 [PATCH 00/12] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Lu Baolu
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 01/12] iommu/vt-d: Use iommu_get_domain_for_dev() in debugfs Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 14:59   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-29  5:14     ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-30 12:14       ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-31  3:02         ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-31 13:10           ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-31 14:11             ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-31 14:53               ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-31 15:01                 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 15:13                   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-31 16:01                     ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 16:21                       ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-31 18:07                         ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 18:51                           ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-31 21:22                             ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 23:10                               ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-01  8:53                                 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-01 12:18                                 ` Joao Martins
2022-06-01 12:33                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-01 13:52                                     ` Joao Martins
2022-06-01 14:22                                       ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-01  6:39                             ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-31 13:52           ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-31 15:59             ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-31 16:42               ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-01  5:47               ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-01  5:33             ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 02/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove for_each_device_domain() Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 15:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-01  8:53   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 03/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove clearing translation data in disable_dmar_iommu() Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 15:01   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-29  5:22     ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 04/12] iommu/vt-d: Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 15:01   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-01  8:56   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Unncessary spinlock for root table alloc and free Lu Baolu
2022-06-01  9:05   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-01  9:09   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-01 10:38     ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in pasid manipulation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-01  9:18   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-01 10:48     ` Baolu Lu
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock() Lu Baolu
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path Lu Baolu
2022-05-27 15:05   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-06-01  9:28   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-01 11:02     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-02  6:29       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-06  1:34         ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 10/12] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller Lu Baolu
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 11/12] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately Lu Baolu
2022-05-27  6:30 ` [PATCH 12/12] iommu/vt-d: Convert device_domain_lock into per-domain mutex Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7217a79d-fd0b-8bb8-1401-a6ab08a47f6d@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox