From: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: fix DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 20:07:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73d900564ce9b0d773c801efe8b8689946bef150.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0316e4f0-b0ad-c702-676f-36347b4ebcb1@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 10:29 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-11-01 03:15, Walter Wu wrote:
> > DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING is to avoid creating a kernel mapping
> > for the allocated buffer, but current implementation is that
> > PTE of allocated buffer in kernel page table is valid. So we
> > should set invalid for PTE of allocate buffer so that there are
> > no kernel mapping for the allocated buffer.
>
> No, the semantic of NO_KERNEL_MAPPING is an indication that the
> *caller*
> does not need a mapping, such that the DMA API implementation may
> choose
> to optimise for that internally. It has never given any guarantee of
> any
> particular behaviour - like most attributes it is only a hint.
>
> > In some cases, we don't hope the allocated buffer to be read
> > by cpu or speculative execution, so we use
> > DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
> > to get no kernel mapping in order to achieve this goal.
>
> If it's important that no CPU accesses to this memory can happen,
> then I
> think the only way to absolutely guarantee that is to exclude it
> from
> the kernel's memory map in the first place, e.g. as a DT reserved-
> memory
> region with the "no-map" property.
>
Yes, this is our previous implementation, but we hope to use kernel
memory to fix it.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Walter
> Robin.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/dma/direct.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > index 4c6c5e0635e3..aa10b4c5d762 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > #include <linux/set_memory.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > #include "direct.h"
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -169,6 +170,9 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev,
> > size_t size,
> > if (!PageHighMem(page))
> > arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, size);
> > *dma_handle = phys_to_dma_direct(dev,
> > page_to_phys(page));
> > + /* remove kernel mapping for pages */
> > + set_memory_valid((unsigned
> > long)phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, *dma_handle)),
> > + size >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
> > /* return the page pointer as the opaque cookie */
> > return page;
> > }
> > @@ -278,6 +282,10 @@ void dma_direct_free(struct device *dev,
> > size_t size,
> >
> > if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING) &&
> > !force_dma_unencrypted(dev) && !is_swiotlb_for_alloc(dev))
> > {
> > + size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> > + /* create kernel mapping for pages */
> > + set_memory_valid((unsigned
> > long)phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dma_addr)),
> > + size >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1);
> > /* cpu_addr is a struct page cookie, not a kernel
> > address */
> > dma_free_contiguous(dev, cpu_addr, size);
> > return;
> >
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 3:15 [PATCH] dma-direct: fix DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING Walter Wu
2021-11-01 6:10 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-01 8:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-01 12:20 ` Walter Wu
2021-11-01 14:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-02 3:21 ` Walter Wu
2021-11-02 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-01 10:29 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-01 12:07 ` Walter Wu [this message]
2021-11-02 6:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-02 7:08 ` Walter Wu
2021-11-02 7:26 ` Walter Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73d900564ce9b0d773c801efe8b8689946bef150.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox