Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@intel.com>,
	narayan.ranganathan@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Implement set_dev_pasid domain op
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 15:26:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76c98e62-1cac-2ab6-7721-08ec2c1fceb8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230427174937.471668-7-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

On 4/28/23 1:49 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Devices that use ENQCMDS to submit work on buffers mapped by DMA API
> must attach a PASID to the default domain of the device. In preparation
> for this use case, this patch implements set_dev_pasid() for the
> default_domain_ops.
> 
> If the device context has not been set up prior to this call, this will
> set up the device context in addition to PASID attachment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 388453a7415e..f9d6c31cdc8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -278,6 +278,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dmar_satc_units);
>   	list_for_each_entry(rmrr, &dmar_rmrr_units, list)
>   
>   static void device_block_translation(struct device *dev);
> +static void intel_iommu_detach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					    struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid);
>   static void intel_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain);
>   
>   int dmar_disabled = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON);
> @@ -4091,8 +4093,7 @@ static void device_block_translation(struct device *dev)
>   	iommu_disable_pci_caps(info);
>   	if (!dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev)) {
>   		if (sm_supported(iommu))
> -			intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, dev,
> -						    IOMMU_DEF_RID_PASID, false);
> +			intel_iommu_detach_device_pasid(&info->domain->domain, dev, IOMMU_DEF_RID_PASID);

device_block_translation() is called when switch RID's domain or release
the device. I assume that we don't need to touch this path when we add
the attach_dev_pasid support.

Blocking DMA translation through RID/PASID should be done in
remove_dev_pasid path.

Or, I overlooked anything?

[...]

>   
> +static int intel_iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					   struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> +	struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
> +	struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!pasid_supported(iommu))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = prepare_domain_attach_device(domain, dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Most likely the device context has already been set up, will only
> +	 * take a domain ID reference. Otherwise, device context will be set
> +	 * up here.

The "otherwise" case is only default domain deferred attaching case,
right?

When the device driver starts to call attach_dev_pasid api, it means
that the bus and device DMA configuration have been done. We could do
the deferred default domain attaching now. So, perhaps we should add
below code in the core:

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index f1dcfa3f1a1b..633b5ca53606 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -3296,6 +3296,12 @@ int iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain 
*domain,
         if (!group)
                 return -ENODEV;

+       ret = iommu_deferred_attach(dev, group->default_domain);
+       if (ret) {
+               iommu_group_put(group);
+               return ret;
+       }
+
         mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
         curr = xa_cmpxchg(&group->pasid_array, pasid, NULL, domain, 
GFP_KERNEL);
         if (curr) {

Perhaps need to call iommu_deferred_attach() inside the group->mutex
critical region?

> +	 * The upper layer APIs make no assumption about the ordering between
> +	 * device attachment and the PASID attachment.
> +	 */
> +	ret = dmar_domain_attach_device(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev);

Calling attach_device on the attach_dev_pasid path is not right.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Attach device failed\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	return dmar_domain_attach_device_pasid(dmar_domain, iommu, dev, pasid);
> +}
> +
> +
> +
>   const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
>   	.capable		= intel_iommu_capable,
>   	.domain_alloc		= intel_iommu_domain_alloc,
> @@ -4802,6 +4861,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
>   #endif
>   	.default_domain_ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
>   		.attach_dev		= intel_iommu_attach_device,
> +		.set_dev_pasid          = intel_iommu_attach_device_pasid,
>   		.map_pages		= intel_iommu_map_pages,
>   		.unmap_pages		= intel_iommu_unmap_pages,
>   		.iotlb_sync_map		= intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map,

Best regards,
baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-03  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-27 17:49 [PATCH v5 0/7] Re-enable IDXD kernel workqueue under DMA API Jacob Pan
2023-04-27 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] iommu: Generalize default PCIe requester ID PASID Jacob Pan
2023-04-28  9:38   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-04-28 15:56     ` Jacob Pan
2023-05-05  8:28       ` Tian, Kevin
2023-05-09 20:39         ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-27 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] iommu/sva: Explicitly exclude RID_PASID from SVA Jacob Pan
2023-04-28  9:40   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-04-28 15:56     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-27 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] iommu: Move global PASID allocation from SVA to core Jacob Pan
2023-04-28  9:46   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-04-28 16:40     ` Jacob Pan
2023-05-03  6:32   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-04 21:26     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-27 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Factoring out PASID set up helper function Jacob Pan
2023-04-28  9:47   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-05-03  6:37     ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-04 21:39       ` Jacob Pan
2023-05-04 21:27     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-27 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Prepare PASID attachment beyond RID_PASID Jacob Pan
2023-05-03  6:49   ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-04 21:53     ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-27 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Implement set_dev_pasid domain op Jacob Pan
2023-05-03  7:26   ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2023-05-04 23:03     ` Jacob Pan
2023-05-05  2:58       ` Baolu Lu
2023-05-05 20:32         ` Jacob Pan
2023-04-27 17:49 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] dmaengine/idxd: Re-enable kernel workqueue under DMA API Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76c98e62-1cac-2ab6-7721-08ec2c1fceb8@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narayan.ranganathan@intel.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tom.zanussi@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox