From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/22] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:50:07 +0000 Message-ID: <7ae1df77-18d0-0993-8dab-6af3a4474b42@arm.com> References: <20190317172232.1068-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190317172232.1068-6-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190320093727.45a86866@jacob-builder> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190320093727.45a86866@jacob-builder> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jacob Pan , Eric Auger Cc: yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, vincent.stehle@arm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, eric.auger.pro@gmail.com List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On 20/03/2019 16:37, Jacob Pan wrote: [...] >> +struct iommu_inv_addr_info { >> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_PASID (1 << 0) >> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_ARCHID (1 << 1) >> +#define IOMMU_INV_ADDR_FLAGS_LEAF (1 << 2) >> + __u32 flags; >> + __u32 archid; >> + __u64 pasid; >> + __u64 addr; >> + __u64 granule_size; >> + __u64 nb_granules; >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * First level/stage invalidation information >> + * @cache: bitfield that allows to select which caches to invalidate >> + * @granularity: defines the lowest granularity used for the >> invalidation: >> + * domain > pasid > addr >> + * >> + * Not all the combinations of cache/granularity make sense: >> + * >> + * type | DEV_IOTLB | IOTLB | PASID | >> + * granularity | | | >> cache | >> + * -------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+ >> + * DOMAIN | N/A | Y | >> Y | >> + * PASID | Y | Y | >> Y | >> + * ADDR | Y | Y | >> N/A | >> + */ >> +struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info { >> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE_INFO_VERSION_1 1 >> + __u32 version; >> +/* IOMMU paging structure cache */ >> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB (1 << 0) /* IOMMU IOTLB */ >> +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_DEV_IOTLB (1 << 1) /* Device >> IOTLB */ +#define IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_PASID (1 << 2) /* PASID >> cache */ > Just a clarification, this used to be an enum. You do intend to issue a > single invalidation request on multiple cache types? Perhaps for > virtio-IOMMU? I only see a single cache type in your patch #14. For VT-d > we plan to issue one cache type at a time for now. So this format works > for us. Yes for virtio-iommu I'd like as little overhead as possible, which means a single invalidation message to hit both IOTLB and ATC at once, and the ability to specify multiple pages with @nb_granules. > However, if multiple cache types are issued in a single invalidation. > They must share a single granularity, not all combinations are valid. > e.g. dev IOTLB does not support domain granularity. Just a reminder, > not an issue. Driver could filter out invalid combinations. Agreed. Even the core could filter out invalid combinations based on the table above: IOTLB and domain granularity are N/A. Thanks, Jean > >> + __u8 cache; >> + __u8 granularity; >> + __u8 padding[2]; >> + union { >> + __u64 pasid; >> + struct iommu_inv_addr_info addr_info; >> + }; >> +}; >> + >> + >> #endif /* _UAPI_IOMMU_H */ > > [Jacob Pan] > _______________________________________________ > iommu mailing list > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu >