From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vivek Gautam Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add PCIe SMMU node Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 14:56:05 +0530 Message-ID: <868a3924-928c-ff23-e39f-8c521eec455a@codeaurora.org> References: <5eedbe6d-f440-1a77-8a7e-81a920e3a0e7@free.fr> <82ab78ee-4a38-4eee-f064-272b6f964f17@free.fr> <5aa56120-b686-194b-36d6-8177b5749a19@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Robin Murphy , Marc Gonzalez Cc: Mark Rutland , Jeffrey Hugo , MSM , Douglas Anderson , Evan Green , Bjorn Andersson , Manu Gautam , iommu , Rob Herring , Stanimir Varbanov , PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , Srinivas Kandagatla List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On 4/2/2019 7:24 PM, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 30/03/2019 14:18, Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> You should probably have some "bus" and "iface" clocks too, per the >>> requirement of "qcom,smmu-v2". Maybe Vivek might know what's relevant >>> for MSM8998? >> >> As Jeffrey rightly mentioned, these clocks are not under the control >> of Linux. >> So, we won't need to add clocks to this SMMU. > > OK, in that case the "clock-names" part of binding doc probably wants > refining to reflect which implementations do actually require clocks. Certainly. Marc, do you want to push a patch for the same? Or, let me know I can prepare one. Thanks Vivek > > Robin.