Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Restrict domain attributes to UNMANAGED domains
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:41:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <89d795b9-a6d7-7f41-705c-b918ee66ebf0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484849955-1871-2-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>

On 19/01/17 18:19, Will Deacon wrote:
> The ARM SMMU drivers provide a DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING domain attribute,
> which allows callers of the IOMMU API to request that the page table
> for a domain is installed at stage-2, if supported by the hardware.
> 
> Since setting this attribute only makes sense for UNMANAGED domains,
> this patch returns -ENODEV if the domain_{get,set}_attr operations are
> called on other domain types.

For the sake of discussion, would it make sense to enforce this in
domain_set_attr() itself? The intersection of drivers providing these
callbacks and drivers supporting anything other than unmanaged domains
is currently these two below, so it clearly wouldn't break anything to
put this check in core code today. Looking forward, is there likely to
be any plausible situation where users of a managed domain would be
legitimate in mucking about with its attrs, on any platform?

Robin.

> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 6 ++++++
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c    | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 4d6ec444a9d6..c254325b0c7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1839,6 +1839,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>  
> +	if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	switch (attr) {
>  	case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING:
>  		*(int *)data = (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED);
> @@ -1854,6 +1857,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_set_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>  
> +	if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex);
>  
>  	switch (attr) {
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index a60cded8a6ed..a328ffb75509 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1497,6 +1497,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>  
> +	if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	switch (attr) {
>  	case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING:
>  		*(int *)data = (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED);
> @@ -1512,6 +1515,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_set_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>  
> +	if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex);
>  
>  	switch (attr) {
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-19 18:19 [PATCH 0/5] Implement SMMU passthrough using the default domain Will Deacon
     [not found] ` <1484849955-1871-1-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Restrict domain attributes to UNMANAGED domains Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <1484849955-1871-2-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-19 18:41       ` Robin Murphy [this message]
     [not found]         ` <89d795b9-a6d7-7f41-705c-b918ee66ebf0-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-26 17:06           ` Joerg Roedel
2017-01-26 17:03       ` Joerg Roedel
     [not found]         ` <20170126170329.GB27598-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-26 17:57           ` Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Install bypass S2CRs for IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY domains Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:50     ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Install bypass STEs " Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <1484849955-1871-4-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-19 18:56       ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dma-mapping: Only swizzle DMA ops for IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <1484849955-1871-5-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-19 19:00       ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-26 17:57         ` Will Deacon
2017-01-19 18:19   ` [PATCH 5/5] iommu: Allow default domain type to be set on the kernel command line Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <1484849955-1871-6-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-26 17:15       ` Joerg Roedel
     [not found]         ` <20170126171555.GD27598-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-26 17:26           ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-26 17:48           ` Will Deacon
2017-01-24 15:12   ` [PATCH 0/5] Implement SMMU passthrough using the default domain Sricharan
2017-01-26 17:18     ` Joerg Roedel
     [not found]       ` <20170126171857.GE27598-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-02 15:02         ` Rob Clark
     [not found]           ` <CAF6AEGtfrrwVZ_W86_HqVsiqfcM=XFa+g2LECFYQJmvv7-JSqQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-02 15:12             ` Will Deacon
     [not found]               ` <20170202151241.GE13839-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-03 12:20                 ` Rob Clark
2017-02-02 15:45             ` Sricharan
2017-02-02 16:10               ` Will Deacon
     [not found]                 ` <20170202161047.GG13839-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-03 16:33                   ` Sricharan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=89d795b9-a6d7-7f41-705c-b918ee66ebf0@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox