From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga-VIMSii5OdOuonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: IOMMU - DMA debugging
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 19:02:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9273b2ab-2648-63f7-fe0f-a4462b4e4062@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4002588.18GdeEVaQi@harkonnen>
On 12/07/17 18:20, Federico Vaga wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:15:34 PM CEST Federico Vaga wrote:
>> Thank you Robin
>>
>> (inline comments)
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 1:10:51 PM CEST Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 12/07/17 08:11, Federico Vaga wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> kernel version 4.4.x
>>>>
>>>> I'm facing an issue with the INTEL IOMMU driver and DMA mapping. I have
>>>> an
>>>> Ethernet driver that uses `dma_alloc_coherent()` to allocate and map
>>>> some
>>>> memory for DMA transfers.
>>>
>>> Assuming 02:00.0 is your actual endpoint and not some upstream aliasing
>>> bridge, is your driver definitely using the correct struct device
>>> pointer corresponding to that for its DMA API calls?
>
> I had a look at this point. The driver is using the device 02:08.0 (which is
> the one that should use) but the errors refers to the 02:00.0. I have a rough
> idea about how the IOMMU works but I do not know the details involved in the
> process.
>
> \-[0000:00]-+-00.0
> +-01.0-[01-02]----00.0-[02]----08.0 <<<<<<<<<<
> +-01.1-[03]----00.0
OK, this is what I suspected might be happening, thanks for confirming.
> Then among all the other devices, I have this from `dmesg`
>
> [...]
> [ 2.212107] DMAR: Hardware identity mapping for device 0000:00:1f.3
> [ 2.219113] DMAR: Hardware identity mapping for device 0000:03:00.0
> [ 2.226118] DMAR: Hardware identity mapping for device 0000:04:00.0
> [ 2.233123] DMAR: Hardware identity mapping for device 0000:04:00.1
> [...]
> [ 2.693295] iommu: Adding device 0000:00:1f.3 to group 22
> [ 2.699350] iommu: Adding device 0000:01:00.0 to group 23
> [ 2.705389] iommu: Adding device 0000:02:08.0 to group 23
> [ 2.711444] iommu: Adding device 0000:03:00.0 to group 24
> [ 2.717552] iommu: Adding device 0000:04:00.0 to group 25
> [...]
>
>
> It misses the message "Hardware identity mapping for device 0000:02:08.0". Is
> it possible that there is not a valid DMAR table?
I'm a bit sketchy on intel-iommu details as well, but based on a quick
scan through the code I'd assume your endpoint doesn't get an identity
mapping because it's a PCI device behind a PCIe-to-PCI bridge (which
ties in with the RID alias to DevFn 00.0). AFAICS that then means that
the DMA ops should always give back a remapped address (i.e. iommu=pt
ends up behaving the same as iommu=on), at which point it does start to
look like your device is simply making bogus accesses.
The IOVA allocator will allocate DMA addresses downwards from
0xfffff000, but your reported fault addresses don't look anything like
that, so I'd imagine that either some part of the driver is bypassing
the DMA API and erroneously passing physical addresses to the hardware,
or alternatively the hardware itself is going wrong somehow (e.g. trying
to read a buffer address from an in-memory descriptor, getting back
junk, and going downhill from there).
Hope that helps,
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-12 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-12 7:11 IOMMU - DMA debugging Federico Vaga
2017-07-12 11:10 ` Robin Murphy
[not found] ` <1c0e4473-9b50-fe0c-d544-71464360ab7f-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-12 12:15 ` Federico Vaga
2017-07-12 17:20 ` Federico Vaga
2017-07-12 18:02 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
[not found] ` <9273b2ab-2648-63f7-fe0f-a4462b4e4062-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-13 8:43 ` Federico Vaga
2017-08-11 9:35 ` Federico Vaga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9273b2ab-2648-63f7-fe0f-a4462b4e4062@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=federico.vaga-VIMSii5OdOuonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox