From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C42F710F4 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 03:28:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1689305306; x=1720841306; h=message-id:date:mime-version:cc:subject:to:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nVIcB82tLh0UA0mJc4/Rq+bVR36taDChNwOAP4F0acA=; b=UxmedvMJVluoYuvDdLnE/xDKSbJJiJgdHZbA7IDSJBgEX06QfuxwzkcS O9WD8uXlDCrKiqw5TNrPKW3gV6HmHkKLanwLMaSOcOzKhWMpvR/tKw+rE 7U24ZZqJsPml7BlvUgEhqTea85Rlk4iVn9HATD3qooMtYwGp4uIJ2ldLc KQk9oSZZoo68dxF2mrQvgDCMRFof6uvbPQi+D2nlqhIp8eNwIj3QKScm1 8j/78yZ8GUw9a4v1SB6OAQsERRmfjNXCTK72t5RephuEmlLiQtS5dI80F 9xJPAYccvmZZq7uNKxv/zBnAW16qYVSjHdwloCFKmI/qq3pMQDTBn1rlE g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10770"; a="429144071" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,204,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="429144071" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jul 2023 20:28:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10770"; a="722230755" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,204,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="722230755" Received: from blu2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.191.49]) ([10.252.191.49]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jul 2023 20:28:19 -0700 Message-ID: <9875863a-eba5-c8fa-a39b-7d3300e3b5ca@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:28:14 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Jason Gunthorpe , Will Deacon , "Liu, Yi L" , "Yu, Fenghua" , "Luck, Tony" Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Make prq draining code generic Content-Language: en-US To: "Tian, Kevin" , Jacob Pan , LKML , "iommu@lists.linux.dev" , Joerg Roedel , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Robin Murphy References: <20230712163355.3177511-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20230712163355.3177511-6-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> From: Baolu Lu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2023/7/13 15:49, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> From: Jacob Pan >> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 12:34 AM >> >> - /* Domain type specific cleanup: */ >> domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(dev, pasid, 0); >> - if (domain) { >> - switch (domain->type) { >> - case IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA: >> - intel_svm_remove_dev_pasid(dev, pasid); >> - break; >> - default: >> - /* should never reach here */ >> - WARN_ON(1); >> - break; >> - } >> + if (!domain) >> + goto out_tear_down; > > WARN_ON() Why? My understanding is that remve_device_pasid could be call in any context including no domain attached. > >> * large and has to be physically contiguous. So it's >> * hard to be as defensive as we might like. >> */ >> - intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, dev, svm->pasid, >> false); >> - intel_svm_drain_prq(dev, svm->pasid); > > after removing the 2 lines the comment above becomes stale. Yes. > >> -static void intel_svm_drain_prq(struct device *dev, u32 pasid) >> +void intel_drain_pasid_prq(struct device *dev, u32 pasid) >> { >> struct device_domain_info *info; >> struct dmar_domain *domain; > > later we should move generic prq handling logic out of svm.c into > a new prq.c Yes. Best regards, baolu