From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0BAA2139C9 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 02:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774234570; cv=none; b=Gf3081QF3y3Yi0MkGEGhVKCGqtOR5LTOvpHx1AttHzs+Ve6QNO+VMyn02oACs3wxiGe3h9N9j9AYy2RoM2ekB7VDHXCCCmPnzPGh83kfVvvJYIoNPQcKsTimS+xKA4rvZtnAJpVJlgOZgC1MlZ1ULdLeLQxQWAxOQWcCIMFKZME= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774234570; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JIt99p+izEaW6V07z4nB4vcCdQxfOJe7vVbQm/2tr1M=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=S2gdwDOUUYJ5ZxpAjSOptMAGuM5KaV2OUIATTI5MCr/DZ3WRDjLgcQoodwCWHgY1u5ybCq63lKhGMiQ24SXcpRsoyGbwRVHCT1dKHZo49uRWeXzujiB6lIf3A8ai3vqZjGfjRfqudkNHMfEKsF8FcM1jUgz+pyHKkKSMvFIQxQc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=G7Eb67jR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="G7Eb67jR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774234569; x=1805770569; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JIt99p+izEaW6V07z4nB4vcCdQxfOJe7vVbQm/2tr1M=; b=G7Eb67jR44/cY6LWjKkC7el0GzTDmq62mJa4z2RScVi3fj+P95a3jvbx h7YvOZDp5CovP3jwR9ECYFuH4H28OPR+jAZXClzn7VMj37nLtCHWHQV6N ivx2pax0HNvF+EUClLTXhLZzbGGvreioAF9CO1afFJM5oZh8F6Wq+UbY/ n2nQ0xAqrkH1yfBeaOQWkhI1BwtJk6OpxMOQHQXibAMxy/J4xfjKqGCXu H51EgAE3Z9JqHN4A8xKmTNH9oxgjmb95x4mHqvsWBktHaaboDklK+p8Wz M7Z6SSJe1vtne004dPmiMcXqLe1QL9ONbnml+C0vJLZ6gAhD1KYh3kt0Y g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: tCVJINStQDiguAPGeZZFcQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cfMgyRozRkiKvwXC96f9PQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11737"; a="75136083" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,136,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="75136083" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2026 19:56:08 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: P0epKf4XQtW73Kejrl1QVA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FYsUI1fpRcOt86Rqo8bqqA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,136,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="254362383" Received: from allen-sbox.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.30]) ([10.239.159.30]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2026 19:56:06 -0700 Message-ID: <9df42fd2-8a27-42be-b827-59d7308dc910@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:54:55 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] iommupt/vtd: Support dirty tracking on PASID To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux.dev" Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "Tian, Kevin" References: <20260205023405.41583-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> <20260206004325.GB943673@ziepe.ca> Content-Language: en-US From: Baolu Lu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/23/26 09:51, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote: > Hi, > > Kindly ping, any comments? This series looks fine to me. I will queue it (with the typo in the subject fixed) for iommu/next if no further concerns. Thanks! > Thanks > Zhenzhong > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 09:34:01PM -0500, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When we add pasid support in QEMU for passthrough device, we found >> PASID attachment to a nested parent domain with dirty tracking failed. >> >> It's because PASID-level dirty tracking is not there yet, by adding it, >> we can enable PASID attachment to such domain. >> >> Thanks >> Zhenzhong >> >> >> Zhenzhong Duan (3): >> iommupt/vtd: Pass dmar_domain pointer to device_set_dirty_tracking() >> iommupt/vtd: Support dirty tracking on PASID >> iommufd/selftest: Test dirty tracking on PASID >